2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2017.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resilience of soils with different texture, mineralogy and organic matter under long-term conservation systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
45
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results emphasise that the soil strengthens over time after soil disturbance (Moraes et al, 2014), enabling the formation of stable aggregates (Moraes et al, 2017), and the formation of continuous pores within the soil profile (Reichert et al, 2016). Increased soil strength and hence σ p over time after soil disturbance can be explained by soil resilience (Bonetti et al, 2017), and the age-hardening phenomena (Moraes et al, 2017). In addition, similar results were observed in the AUC values when comparing MTC 1 to MTC 3 revealing that a 3-year interval after chiselling was enough to detect significant increases in σ p .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…These results emphasise that the soil strengthens over time after soil disturbance (Moraes et al, 2014), enabling the formation of stable aggregates (Moraes et al, 2017), and the formation of continuous pores within the soil profile (Reichert et al, 2016). Increased soil strength and hence σ p over time after soil disturbance can be explained by soil resilience (Bonetti et al, 2017), and the age-hardening phenomena (Moraes et al, 2017). In addition, similar results were observed in the AUC values when comparing MTC 1 to MTC 3 revealing that a 3-year interval after chiselling was enough to detect significant increases in σ p .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The high content of organic C in this biochar (64%) improved the soil water retention [39,40] due to two factors: an increased number of contact points between the particles of the aggregates [41] and a structural rearrangement [42]. The formation of contact points within the aggregates was favored by wet-dry cycles [43], thus reducing the aggregate bulk density and increasing soil pore network and soil water retention at the same time. Thus, over time (from 50 to 150 days) soil water retention increases may be associated with the reconsolidation of soil structure, being governed by age-hardening phenomenon [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Other soil parameters, such as soil organic matter, soil fauna and soil texture (Bonetti, Anghinoni, Moraes, & Fink, 2017;Porre, van Groenigen, De Deyn, de Goede, & Lubbers, 2016;Six et al, 2004;Vreeken-Buijs, Hassink, & Brussaard, 1998), are important for soil structuring and may contribute to the differences in changes in pore morphology and size observed in this study. However, irrespectively of the site-specific conditions (climatic, biological, chemical and physical), the results of the micromorphological and micromorphometrical analysis, together with the physical attributes provided by , Cherubin et al (2017), show that the soil compaction process occurs following LUC.…”
Section: Impacts Of Conversion From Pasture To Sugarcane On Soil MImentioning
confidence: 91%