2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resilience Metric of Equipment System: Theory, Measurement and Sensitivity Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They respectively represent the capability at one period of the process from potential disturbance to return to normal, while system resilience represents the capability over the whole life cycle. Thus, system resilience is not only the sum of reliability, robustness, and recoverability, but also the result that emerges from the combination of the three [ 39 ]. That is, resilience can be described by these three indexes, as shown in Fig 5 .…”
Section: Degradation Trend Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They respectively represent the capability at one period of the process from potential disturbance to return to normal, while system resilience represents the capability over the whole life cycle. Thus, system resilience is not only the sum of reliability, robustness, and recoverability, but also the result that emerges from the combination of the three [ 39 ]. That is, resilience can be described by these three indexes, as shown in Fig 5 .…”
Section: Degradation Trend Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data were centralized on different time intervals delimited to every ten faults that appeared (table 1). R0 represents the resilience scores over the time interval bounded by defects [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], R1 represents the resilience scores over the time interval determined by defects [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and so on. The graphs of the values of the resilience function as a function of time for every ten defects that appeared in the system after the stabilization period of the technical system operation are presented in Figure 1.…”
Section: The Values Of Reliability Parameters [Mtbf] Maintainability ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a statistical point of view, the resilience of a system is correlated with the maintenance functions and the allocation of human and technical resources in order to ensure its operational continuity function [10,11]. In the specialized literature, there are correlations between the resilience levels of a technical system with the different maintenance strategies applied to it [12], but mathematical modelling of the maintenance strategy-resiliencesystemic topology type is impossible to achieve due to the increased variability of the mathematical model. The metrics used to calculate the resilience characteristic belong to complementary and very diversified fields: probabilistic [12], mathematical [13], Bayesian networks [14], statistical techniques [15], Monte Carlo simulation [5], fuzzy systems -relationships modelled by linguistic expressions and using fuzzy set theory [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…is particularly prominent. In 1957, the Electronic Equipment Reliability Advisory Group of the U.S. Department of Defense gave the definition, indices and evaluation methods of reliability in the report "Reliability of Military Electronic Equipment", which laid the foundation for the development of reliability theory in the fields of complex equipment [2], machinery [3], software [4], manufacturing [5], design [6] and PLC management [7], and it provided support for the development of product DMS integration in the fields of aerospace equipment, new energy vehicles, high-end machine tool equipment and engines, and produced great economic benefits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%