Resilience for sustainability as an eco-capability

Abstract

Purpose-This paper aims to identify the dynamic capabilities that foster organizational resilience towards sustainability. Design/methodology/approach-The study is a qualitative multi-case study with Brazilian manufacturers of different industries that provides an in-depth exploration of underlying dimensions towards resilience for sustainability. Findings-The results indicate that to develop organizational resilience towards sustainability, both in theory and in practical terms, the actions required are long-term plans, regular meetings, benchmarking, communication between areas and distinct hierarchies, partnerships and eco-efficient actions. Regarding human aspects, the leader's behaviour and shared culture are the means to encourage, educate and exemplify sustainability for all in the organization. Research limitations/implications-The study has limitations in the form of a small sample size. The implications indicate a relationship between resilience and dynamic capability for sustainability. In other words, resilience develops organizational, human and technological capabilities for sustainability. Such results can improve the organizational strategy construction methods towards sustainability development. Practical implications-The study has two practical implications for companies to continue working for sustainability. The first practical implication is the need to work the processes that are aimed at the exchange of information both internally and externally to the organization. It has been seen in managers' speeches that creating ways to listen to employee suggestions could make important resource-saving discoveries and release waste. Another important source of information for improvement of operations is to listen to civil associations and industry and non-governmental organizations, as well as participate in events, lectures and discussion forums. The second practical implication is the need to work with the human side of the organization; sustainability needs to be a part of the worker's daily life, and it needs to become common to them of the need to reflect on how to improve sustainability of processes for which they are responsible. To achieve this goal, companies need to work the pillar of cohesion resilience, emphasizing the behaviour of leaders (role models) and organizational culture.

Thriving, Not Just Surviving in Changing Times: How Sustainability, Agility and Digitalization Intertwine with Organizational Resilience

“…If sustainability is defined holistically, the required balance and the interplay of the three values (environmental, social, economic) necessitates a discussion of whether and how resilience can contribute to overall organizational sustainability, or, more in general, whether and how the two concepts are related [70]. As mentioned above, the dominant interpretations of resilience in the management context prescribe absorption, bouncing back to initial conditions, or adaptation towards reaching a new equilibrium without an explicit consideration of whether the initial conditions or the new conditions are more favorable or "sustainable" [71].…”

The Sustainable Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility: A Global Analysis and Future Trends

“…The most prolific countries in the study of the research topic, since the last few years, are developing research on CSR in the controversial sectors activity, such as those related to armament companies, nuclear power plant construction companies, manufacturing companies of warplanes and missiles, companies that manufacture armoured vehicles, nuclear submarines and guidance systems for nuclear missiles, or companies dedicated to military electronics, flight simulators, shooting systems and electronic defense [141]. On the other hand, research is also being carried out on the organizations' capacities to face a constantly changing environment, in relation to the development of sustainability as an ecological capacity [142,143], and on the contribution to the transparency of the reports of the financial performance driven by institutional pressures or differentiation strategies [144]. Figure 4 shows a collaboration map between major countries based on the co-authorship of their authors.…”

Dynamic Capabilities Erosion in Indonesia’s Retail Industry: Consumers’ Perspective on Matahari Department Store

“…The theoretical background used in this study is the dynamic capability theory, which is the organization's ability to adapt to the changes in environment, opportunities and technology to maintain its competitiveness through improving, combing, protecting and reconfiguring business with the aim to expand, improve, and protect the organization's sustainability (Eisenhardt & Martin, 2006;Laaksonen & Peltoniemi, 2018;Teece, 2007). Dynamic capabilities illustrate how organization overcome problems in its environment through adapting in order to survive (Ammentorp, 1968;Souza, Alves, Macini, Cezarino, & Liboni, 2017). Dynamic capabilities can create opportunity for value creation through modification (Eisenhardt & Martin, 2006).…”