Resilience-based post-disaster recovery strategies for road-bridge networks

Zhang, Weili; Wang, Naiyu; Nicholson, Charles

doi:10.1080/15732479.2016.1271813

Cited by 153 publications

(51 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Recently, Zhang, Wang, and Nicholson (2017) introduced a resilience-based methodology to optimize the scheduling of the post-event recovery actions of roadbridge transportation networks. This methodology accounts for network topology, redundancy, traffic flow, damage level, and available resources, while the total recovery time (TRT) and the skew of the recovery trajectory (SRT) are considered to quantify the rapidity and efficiency of the road-bridge network recovery.…”

Section: Facility and System Resiliencementioning

confidence: 99%

State of the research in community resilience: progress and challenges

Koliou

Lindt

McAllister

et al. 2018

Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure

280

113

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Community resilience has been addressed across multiple disciplines including environmental sciences, engineering, sociology, psychology, and economics. Interest in community resilience gained momentum following several key natural and human-caused hazards in the United States and worldwide. To date, a comprehensive community resilience model that encompasses the performance of all the physical and socio-economic components from immediate impact through the recovery phase of a natural disaster has not been available. This paper summarizes a literature review of previous community resilience studies with a focus on natural hazards, which includes primarily models of individual infrastructure systems, their interdependencies, and community economic and social systems. A series of national and international initiatives aimed at community resilience are also summarized in this study. This paper suggests extensions of existing modeling methodologies aimed at developing an improved, integrated understanding of resilience that can be used by policy-makers in preparation for future events.

show abstract

Section: Facility and System Resiliencementioning

confidence: 99%

State of the research in community resilience: progress and challenges

Koliou

Lindt

McAllister

et al. 2018

Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure

280

113

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For instance, within the field of systems engineering, quality attributes as non-functional requirements are used to evaluate the performance of a system (Weck, Roos, & Magee, 2011). Notable quality attributes include redundancy, efficiency, diversity (Molyneaux, Wagner, Froome, & Foster, 2012), stability, technological maturity, innovative ability (Grafakos & Flamos, 2017) reliability, severity, time to recovery (Guidotti et al, 2016), robustness, fault tolerance, survivability, agility (Hosseini et al, 2016), vulnerability, recoverability (Henry & Emmanuel Ramirez-Marquez, 2012), rapidity (Zhang, Wang, & Nicholson, 2017) and resourcefulness (Cimellaro, Reinhorn, & Bruneau, 2010).…”

Section: Proposal For Resilience Assessment Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Continuous and multidimensional assessment of resilience based on functionality analysis for interconnected systems

Kamissoko

Nastov²,

Bénaben

et al. 2018

Structure and Infrastructure Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The increasing number of disruptions to critical infrastructure, like natural disasters, terrorist attacks or internal failure is today a major problem of society. Concern is even greater when considering the interconnected nature of critical infrastructure, which might lead to failure propagation, causing domino and cascade effects. To mitigate such outcomes, critical infrastructure must recover its capacity to function with regard to several criteria. Stakeholders must therefore analyse and improve the resilience of critical infrastructure before any disruption occurs, and base this analysis on different models so as to guarantee society's vital needs. Current resilience assessment methods are mainly oriented toward the context of a single system, thus narrowing their criteria metrics, limiting flexibility and adaptation to other contexts and overlooking the interconnected nature of systems. This article introduces a new tool-equipped approach that makes it possible to define a model to evaluate the functionalities of interconnected systems. The model is then used to assess the resilience of these systems based on simple and generic criteria that can be extended and adapted. Several assertions related to the concept of resilience and some resilience indicators are also introduced. A case study provides the validation performed by experts from several domains.

show abstract

“…Other approaches to quantify resilience can be found in Cimellaro et al (2010), Zobel (2011), and Bocchini et al (2013). Recently, Zhang et al (2017) have proposed two resilience metrics, namely the total recovery time (TRT) representing the rapidity of the restoration process and the skew of the recovery trajectory (SRT), directly linked to the efficiency of the restoration process. The latter aims to capture the characteristics of the recovery trajectory that relates to the efficiency of those restoration strategies considered.…”

Section: Research Technical Performance Indicatorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

State-Of-Research on Performance Indicators for Bridge Quality Control and Management

Zanini

Faleschini

Casas

2019

Front. Built Environ.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study provides a review of the most diffused technical and non-technical performance indicators adopted worldwide by infrastructure owners. This work, developed within the European COST Action TU 1406-"Quality specifications for roadway bridges, standardization at a European level," aims to summarize the state-of-art maintenance scheduling practices adopted by bridge owners, mainly focusing on the identification and classification of the most diffused performance indicators (PIs). PIs are subdivided in technical and non-technical ones: for this latter subclass, PIs are classified in environmental, social and economic-targeted. The study aims to be a reference for researchers dealing with performance-based assessments and bridge maintenance and management practices.

show abstract

Resilience-based post-disaster recovery strategies for road-bridge networks

Cited by 153 publications

References 22 publications

State of the research in community resilience: progress and challenges

State of the research in community resilience: progress and challenges

Continuous and multidimensional assessment of resilience based on functionality analysis for interconnected systems

State-Of-Research on Performance Indicators for Bridge Quality Control and Management

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About