2008
DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rnn056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residues of Intertwining Operators for Classical Groups

Abstract: Let˜GLet˜ Let˜G be a symplectic or even orthogonal group over a p-adic field F , and M the Levi factor of a maximal parabolic subgroup of˜Gof˜ of˜G. Suppose that M has the shape of three blocks of the same size. Let π be a supercuspidal representation of M. In this paper, we give a simple explicit expression for the residue of the standard intertwining operator for the parabolic induction of π from M to G.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most notable is the work of Spallone [33] and the joint work of the second named author and Spallone [30], which give more precise and definitive results in certain cases that have been the subject of our study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Most notable is the work of Spallone [33] and the joint work of the second named author and Spallone [30], which give more precise and definitive results in certain cases that have been the subject of our study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The integration formulas obtained in this article are central to an ongoing project to determine residues of intertwining operators acting on parabolically induced representations of classical groups over p-adic fields. In this section we display the expected analogue of the main result of [23], which was restricted to the case of dim W = dim X. We omit the details, but Lemma 1 above is the main entrypoint.…”
Section: A Goldberg-shahidi Pairingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These intertwining operators are used to define Langlands-Shahidi L-functions, and the project connects the theory of L-functions to functoriality. We refer the reader to the papers ( [17], [18], [7], [8], [9], [23], [19], [6], [25], [12], [28], [27]) of Goldberg, Shahidi, Wen-Wei Li, Li Cai, Bin Xu, Xiaoxiang Yu, Varma and the second author for details and progress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are stated as Theorem 4.12 and summarized for individual groups as Propositions 4.26 -4.31.The case of induction from other discrete series representation of M must also be addressed and it is left for the future. One should also verify the equality of the arithmetic R-groups, defined by Langlands and Arthur [1, §7], with the analytic R-groups, defined by Knapp and Stein [8], as conjectured by Langlands and Arthur.The poles of intertwining operators can also be determined by direct calculations and there is a large body of work on this topic, starting with [42,43,16,17,18] and ending with some recent work [45,48,34,10], where the connection to functoriality is fully established in some rather general cases (SO(2n + 1, F )).The theory developed in [39] (Theorem 4.24 here) applies to any quasi-split group and in [33], Jing Feng Lau has determined the complete reducibility results for exceptional groups E 6 , E 7 , and E 8 , where M der is a product of three SL-groups, using poles of triple product L-functions which are of Artin type [32]. The case of exceptional group G 2 was fully treated in [39] This paper is organized as follows.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The poles of intertwining operators can also be determined by direct calculations and there is a large body of work on this topic, starting with [42,43,16,17,18] and ending with some recent work [45,48,34,10], where the connection to functoriality is fully established in some rather general cases (SO(2n + 1, F )).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%