1994
DOI: 10.1090/conm/166/01634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residue periodicity in subgroup counting functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We give a new proof of this known fact in order to obtain some results on periodicity of sequences Hp(n) p βn (mod p r ) n∈N , where r ∈ N + and β n is mentioned lower bound of ν p (H p (n)) or β n = ν p (H p (n)). Moreover, we show that for each prime number p and j ∈ {0, ..., p − 1} there exists a b j ∈ {0, ..., p − 1} such that H p (kp 2 + jp + b j ) = k(p − 1) + j for any k ∈ N. These results can be seen as a complement of the series of papers [5,10,6,7]. In Section 5 we describe the p-adic valuations of the numbers H d (n), where p > d. In order to do this, we show that the sequence (H d (n)) n∈N is a restriction of a differentiable function f d : Z p → Z p , where Z p is a ring of p-adic integers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…We give a new proof of this known fact in order to obtain some results on periodicity of sequences Hp(n) p βn (mod p r ) n∈N , where r ∈ N + and β n is mentioned lower bound of ν p (H p (n)) or β n = ν p (H p (n)). Moreover, we show that for each prime number p and j ∈ {0, ..., p − 1} there exists a b j ∈ {0, ..., p − 1} such that H p (kp 2 + jp + b j ) = k(p − 1) + j for any k ∈ N. These results can be seen as a complement of the series of papers [5,10,6,7]. In Section 5 we describe the p-adic valuations of the numbers H d (n), where p > d. In order to do this, we show that the sequence (H d (n)) n∈N is a restriction of a differentiable function f d : Z p → Z p , where Z p is a ring of p-adic integers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…We will give a proof of the fact that ord p (a(n)) ≥ γ(n) (Corollary 3.3 in Section 3). This inequality is shown in [5,6,8,10] and is also a consequence of [7, equation (3)]. If p = 2, this result is equivalent to [3,Theorem 10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Example 2.1. Let π ∈ S 29,3 be the following permutation in cycle notation: Then f 3 (π ) = {(1, 2, 3) 3 , (4, 5, 6), (4), (4,6,5), (5), (6), (7,7,7), (8) 3 , (9) 2 , (9, 10, 10)}. The permutation π belongs to an equivalence class (7,7,7); (1, 2, 3) 3 , (4, 5, 6), (4, 6, 5), (9, 10, 10); (4), (5), (6), (9) (4,5,6), (4, 6, 5), (9, 10, 10), (4), (5), (6), (9) 2 .…”
Section: A Combinatorial Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using generating function, Grady and Newman [6] obtained, for any prime p, ord p τ p (n) Using p-adic analysis, Ochiai [10] found the exact value of ord p (τ p (n)) for prime numbers p 23. Let .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%