2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residual stress measurements in offshore wind monopile weldments using neutron diffraction technique and contour method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
26
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The strain-controlled cyclic test results showed that the load carrying capacity of the cross-weld specimen was comparable to that of the BM. Static test results in the literature 29 presented in Table 1 showed that the strengths of WM and HAZ were both slightly higher than the BM, but such behavior was not noticed in the cyclic test performed in this study. This can be explained by the cyclic softening behavior (Figure 7) observed within the first 20 cycles in this study.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…The strain-controlled cyclic test results showed that the load carrying capacity of the cross-weld specimen was comparable to that of the BM. Static test results in the literature 29 presented in Table 1 showed that the strengths of WM and HAZ were both slightly higher than the BM, but such behavior was not noticed in the cyclic test performed in this study. This can be explained by the cyclic softening behavior (Figure 7) observed within the first 20 cycles in this study.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…In many reports, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] microstructure, mean stress, residual stress, mechanical properties and initial crack length were said to have large influence on the threshold and final failure regions. In addition, the accelerated region is said to be influenced by sample thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As depicted in Figure 6, there is a wide scatter in the fatigue crack growth rate in the threshold region for both the results predicted by the experiment and the FEA SMART© analysis tool. However, along the Paris' region, that is, after the threshold region, the test data points are seen to be dispersed around the best fit line of the experimental data such that it aligns in and can be represented by a straight line 54,65,71–79 . From the foregoing, it can be inferred that there is reasonable agreement between the test results and the FEA SMART© analysis results predicted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%