1964
DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(64)90181-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residual strain and the fracture stress-grain size relationship in brittle solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their conclusions are, in some ways, contrary to the idea that the strength change of polycrystalline materials that consist of anisotropic crystals primarily are governed by the formation of grain-boundary microcracks. 8,9,35,[64][65][66][67] Although a large decrease in fracture strength should be caused by the grain-boundary microcracking, before the formation of apparent microcracks, some degradation of the grain boundary (because of internal stresses and/or a change in chemistry) may have occurred and influenced the fracture toughness and, thus, the fracture strength. 8,68,69 These effects should vary from material to material and also be strongly dependent on the irradiation conditions; therefore, general performance (such as dependency on fluence or volume expansion) cannot be predicted easily for a variety of ceramics.…”
Section: (2) Bending or Compressive Strength And Fracture Toughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their conclusions are, in some ways, contrary to the idea that the strength change of polycrystalline materials that consist of anisotropic crystals primarily are governed by the formation of grain-boundary microcracks. 8,9,35,[64][65][66][67] Although a large decrease in fracture strength should be caused by the grain-boundary microcracking, before the formation of apparent microcracks, some degradation of the grain boundary (because of internal stresses and/or a change in chemistry) may have occurred and influenced the fracture toughness and, thus, the fracture strength. 8,68,69 These effects should vary from material to material and also be strongly dependent on the irradiation conditions; therefore, general performance (such as dependency on fluence or volume expansion) cannot be predicted easily for a variety of ceramics.…”
Section: (2) Bending or Compressive Strength And Fracture Toughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inverse relation between ac and~ is evident from (2.4). The energy balanc'e argument leading to (2.4) has often been used to determine a critical grain size for spontaneous cracking (Clarke, 1964;Davidge and Green, 1968;Kuszyk and Bradt, 1973;Cleveland and Bradt, 1978;Evans, 1978). Equations (2.1-2.4) may now be combined to calculate the fraction q of grain facets which are likely to fracture during cooling.…”
Section: Vol 115 July 1993mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These internal stresses, induced by the anisotropy of thermal contraction between adjacent grains, can promote spontaneous cracking along grain facets (e.g., Clarke, 1964;Matsuo and Sasaki, 1966;Davidge and Green, 1968;Kuszyk and Bradt, 1973;Cleveland and Bradt, 1978;Evans, 1978;Blenctell and Coble, 1982;Yu and Evans, 1985;Fredrich and Wong, 1986). The occurrence ofmicrocracking has been found to depend on the scale of the microstructure in that there exists a critical grain size in single-phase systems below which grain boundary microfracture is essentially suppressed (Matsuo and Sasaki, 1966;Evans, 1978;Rice and Pohanka, 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%