Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete V 2006
DOI: 10.1061/40826(186)49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residual Static Resistance of Welded Stud Shear Connectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6. The results of the five additional tests given in [13] with exact the same specimen geometry and supporting condition and a different relative peak load show the same characteristics and are also illustrated in Fig. 6.…”
Section: Reduced Static Strengthmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…6. The results of the five additional tests given in [13] with exact the same specimen geometry and supporting condition and a different relative peak load show the same characteristics and are also illustrated in Fig. 6.…”
Section: Reduced Static Strengthmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Thus, to include various effects from specimen geometry and material properties, the loading parameters in each test program are considered as relative values with the static strength as the reference parameter. As the effect of the static strength on the fatigue life was not considered, in most previous works except in tests of Oehlers [7], Hanswille et al [14] and Veljcovic, Johansson [13] short time static tests do not exist. In such cases the static resistance of the headed shear studs is calculated with the model given in Eurocode 4.…”
Section: Procedures For the Comparison Of Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most of the data on connectors have been obtained from various types of push-out test. Since the 1960s, various researchers have conducted a great number of cyclic push-out tests to determine the fatigue life of shear connectors (Akao, Kurita, & Hiragi, 1982;Feldmann, Gesella, & Leffer, 2006;Feldmann, Hechler, Hegger, & Rauscher, 2008;Hanswille, Porsch, & Ustundag, 2007;Johnson, 2000;Leea, Shimb, & Changc, 2005;Nakajima et al, 2003;Oehlers, 1989;Slutter & Driscoll, 1965;Veljkovic & Johansson, 2006) Although safety factor in initial design may delay the occurrence of fatigue problems, the priori negligence of corrosion pits in structural integrity analysis may lead to significant overestimation of the damage tolerance ability of existing steel structures (Petroyiannis, Kermanidis, & Akid, 2005). There is lack of protection between the concrete slab and steel girder interface and also makes corrosion difficult to be detected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%