2021
DOI: 10.1002/lary.29609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residual Perforation Risk Assessment of Intratympanic Steroids via Tympanostomy Tube Versus Transtympanic Injections

Abstract: Objectives/Hypothesis To investigate the risk of residual tympanic membrane (TM) perforation after intratympanic (IT) steroidal treatment administered via transtympanic injection compared with trans‐tympanostomy tube (TyT). Study Design Case series, systematic review and meta analysis. Methods Data were retrieved from the medical files of an original cohort of all consecutive patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss necessitating IT steroidal treatment in a tertiary medical center between January 1, 201… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our independent meta‐analysis on the same subject, “Residual Perforation Risk Assessment of Intratympanic Steroids via Tympanostomy Tube Versus Transtympanic Injections,” was published May 2021 in the The Laryngoscope. 2 While both of these systematic reviews were conducted almost simultaneously at 2 opposite sides of the globe (the Far East and the Middle East), they arrived at different conclusions: while our meta‐analysis found out no association between the modality of intratympanic administration of steroids (ITAoS) and risk of iatrogenic residual tympanic membrane perforation (IRTMP), theirs found a statistically significant association between them, with an IRTMP rate of 0.073 (95% CI, 0.0459‐0.1113) in the ventilation tube group and 0.010 (95% CI, 0.0045‐0.0216) in the myringocentesis group ( P <. 001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our independent meta‐analysis on the same subject, “Residual Perforation Risk Assessment of Intratympanic Steroids via Tympanostomy Tube Versus Transtympanic Injections,” was published May 2021 in the The Laryngoscope. 2 While both of these systematic reviews were conducted almost simultaneously at 2 opposite sides of the globe (the Far East and the Middle East), they arrived at different conclusions: while our meta‐analysis found out no association between the modality of intratympanic administration of steroids (ITAoS) and risk of iatrogenic residual tympanic membrane perforation (IRTMP), theirs found a statistically significant association between them, with an IRTMP rate of 0.073 (95% CI, 0.0459‐0.1113) in the ventilation tube group and 0.010 (95% CI, 0.0045‐0.0216) in the myringocentesis group ( P <. 001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passé ce délai, seule une réhabilitation auditive est recommandée. 2 FIG 222 L'adjonction d'un gel hydrosoluble résorption lente, comme l'acide hyaluronique, pourrait permettre de prolonger la durée de diffusion cochléaire23 et réduire la fuite par la trompe d'Eustache. Le tableau 3 donne un exemple de protocole de préparation d'injection trans tympanique.…”
unclassified