1994
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.5450720214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residual oil cracking combined with hydrogen production by steam‐iron reaction

Abstract: A new residual oil upgrading process has been developed. Residual oils were cracked over an iron oxide catalyst with simultaneous generation of hydrogen. The newly‐developed iron oxide catalyst containing CaO and Cr2O3 was found to be a good catalyst for this process because it exhibited stable activity in the steam‐iron reaction in the laboratory experiment and also in a large scale pilot plant. Effects of these foreign oxides on redox cycles were investigated. The catalyst was designed so as to maintain the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many possible reaction pathways, including the following: (1) devolatilization, (2) steam reforming of char, (3) reforming of tar in the gas phase, (4) reforming or cracking of coke on the alumina, (5) reforming or cracking of coke on the iron oxide, (6) the water-gas shift reaction (WGSR) on the active site of the char surface, 12 (7) reforming of char by contact with the iron oxide, and (8) the steam-iron reaction. [13][14][15] The steam reforming of char (path 2) and the WGSR on char (path 6) can be eliminated by using a two-stage fluidized bed reactor, because in this reactor steam can come into contact with the coke on the Fe-impregnated alumina, but not with the char. In the single-stage reactor, char is gradually accumulated in the bed and then steam reforming is promoted by contact between the iron oxide and the char (path 7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There are many possible reaction pathways, including the following: (1) devolatilization, (2) steam reforming of char, (3) reforming of tar in the gas phase, (4) reforming or cracking of coke on the alumina, (5) reforming or cracking of coke on the iron oxide, (6) the water-gas shift reaction (WGSR) on the active site of the char surface, 12 (7) reforming of char by contact with the iron oxide, and (8) the steam-iron reaction. [13][14][15] The steam reforming of char (path 2) and the WGSR on char (path 6) can be eliminated by using a two-stage fluidized bed reactor, because in this reactor steam can come into contact with the coke on the Fe-impregnated alumina, but not with the char. In the single-stage reactor, char is gradually accumulated in the bed and then steam reforming is promoted by contact between the iron oxide and the char (path 7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The iron oxide played an important role in H 2 formation during steam reforming, but it is difficult to determine the H 2 formation pathway during steam reforming on Fe-impregnated alumina. There are many possible reaction pathways, including the following: (1) devolatilization, (2) steam reforming of char, (3) reforming of tar in the gas phase, (4) reforming or cracking of coke on the alumina, (5) reforming or cracking of coke on the iron oxide, (6) the water−gas shift reaction (WGSR) on the active site of the char surface, (7) reforming of char by contact with the iron oxide, and (8) the steam−iron reaction. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to Table 2, it is found that both CL and CD contain some Fe 2 O 3 . By the acts of iron oxide, the quality of H 2 -rich gas may be further upgraded as the following reaction paths: [20][21][22] Fe From reactions 1-4, iron oxide enhances the water-gas shift reaction and the reforming reactions of tar and light hydrocarbon (C n H m ), which all contribute to the increment of H 2 yield. For the Ca-based catalyst, active ingredient CaO displays better catalytic selectivity for the reactions of tar and carbon but a poor role in the reforming reaction of light hydrocarbon and the water-gas shift reaction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%