2015
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b01261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residual Metallic Contamination of Transferred Chemical Vapor Deposited Graphene

Abstract: Integration of graphene with Si microelectronics is very appealing by offering a potentially broad range of new functionalities. New materials to be integrated with the Si platform must conform to stringent purity standards. Here, we investigate graphene layers grown on copper foils by chemical vapor deposition and transferred to silicon wafers by wet etching and electrochemical delamination methods with respect to residual submonolayer metallic contaminations. Regardless of the transfer method and associated … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
233
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 258 publications
(239 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(62 reference statements)
5
233
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We associate this striking difference with reduced ion energy in VHF plasmas 13 and resulting significantly lower amount of bombardment-related defects in the hexagonal network of sp Commercially available graphene on Cu foils was transferred onto 100 nm SiO 2 substrates using wet etch transfer technique. 17,18 All graphene samples (1cm x 1cm) for both RF PECVD and VHF PECVD were cut from the same piece of 5cm x 5cm-large graphene/Cu foil to ensure a fair comparison between both methods. Before Si deposition samples were annealed in UHV at 400°C for 20 min to remove residual polymer used as a support in the transfer process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We associate this striking difference with reduced ion energy in VHF plasmas 13 and resulting significantly lower amount of bombardment-related defects in the hexagonal network of sp Commercially available graphene on Cu foils was transferred onto 100 nm SiO 2 substrates using wet etch transfer technique. 17,18 All graphene samples (1cm x 1cm) for both RF PECVD and VHF PECVD were cut from the same piece of 5cm x 5cm-large graphene/Cu foil to ensure a fair comparison between both methods. Before Si deposition samples were annealed in UHV at 400°C for 20 min to remove residual polymer used as a support in the transfer process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 2a have a considerably smaller amount of backside graphene residue which can trap the metal catalyst between transferred graphene film and backside graphene flake. Although not all metal residues can be eliminated with this method because the metal residues can exist not only at trapped surface but also at any other morphological feature such as grain boundaries, wrinkles, graphene adlayer, etc., it can be relatively reduced [24]. Additional research is needed to eliminate them.…”
Section: Bubble Transfer Methods For Transferring Graphenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not all metal residues can be eliminated with this method because the metal residues can exist not only at trapped surface but also at any other morphological feature such as grain boundaries, wrinkles, graphene adlayer, etc., it can be relatively reduced [24]. Additional research is needed to eliminate them.…”
Section: Bubble Transfer Methods For Transferring Graphenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained Cu sheets with graphene layers were placed and stored in argon atmosphere. In a separate experiment, graphene deposition on Cu from methane was carried out according to procedure described in the work [29]. …”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%