Abstract:PEG bowel preparations increase RGV mildly, but seem to have no clinical significance. These results support the current fasting guidelines for colonoscopy.
“…Recently, Cheng et al found a mean RGV of 28.5 ± 23.2 mL in 330 low‐to‐medium risk patients undergoing a same‐day EGD and colonoscopy using a PEG‐based split‐dose bowel preparation with a runway time of 3.4 ± 1.0 h. The RGV did not differ in patients with 2, 3 and ≥3 h runway time, using a total of 3 L of PEG‐ containing bowel preparation. The mean RGV in 165 patients with a runway time of 2–3 h was 27 ± 19.4 mL . Unlike the later study, our data showed a statistically significant increase in RGV when the runway time was ≤3 h. However, this finding needs to be interpreted with caution as there were only 17 patients in this group and such a magnitude of difference is unlikely to be clinically significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our study showed a mean RGV of 17.7 AE 19.2 mL, with a mean runway time of 5.8 AE 2.0 h, which is similar to that reported in multiple studies (20-25 mL), leading to major society guideline recommendations of a clear liquid intake of 200 mL/h for up to 2 h before the induction of anesthesia. 38 37 Unlike the later study, our data showed a statistically significant increase in RGV when the runway time was ≤3 h. However, this finding needs to be interpreted with caution as there were only 17 patients in this group and such a magnitude of difference is unlikely to be clinically significant.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Excluding PPIs, other medications have not been found to correlate with RGV. The effect of medications including PPIs is likely to be small, given that our data are similar to others where the medication intake was recorded, and this is unlikely to affect the validity of the results . The correlation between age and RGV independent of PPI therapy was also noted in a similar context …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The effect of medications including PPIs is likely to be small, given that our data are similar to others where the medication intake was recorded, and this is unlikely to affect the validity of the results. [35][36][37]48 The correlation between age and RGV independent of PPI therapy was also noted in a similar context. 44 Our study adds to the accumulating evidence that favors the intake of 1 L bowel preparation regimen containing PEG close to deep sedation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…A limited number of studies including 659 patients in total have shown that, the RGV after a mean runway time of 2-5 h did not differ significantly from that resulted from a longer runway time after splitdose colonoscopy preparation. [35][36][37] However, the optimal time between the last colonoscopy preparation agent intake and sedation for colonoscopy has not been defined and remains a matter of debate.…”
The consumption of bowel preparation agent within 3-4 h before propofol sedation resulted in a similar RGV and pH as those achieved by more prolonged fasting, with no increased risk of aspiration even in patients perceived to be at high risk.
“…Recently, Cheng et al found a mean RGV of 28.5 ± 23.2 mL in 330 low‐to‐medium risk patients undergoing a same‐day EGD and colonoscopy using a PEG‐based split‐dose bowel preparation with a runway time of 3.4 ± 1.0 h. The RGV did not differ in patients with 2, 3 and ≥3 h runway time, using a total of 3 L of PEG‐ containing bowel preparation. The mean RGV in 165 patients with a runway time of 2–3 h was 27 ± 19.4 mL . Unlike the later study, our data showed a statistically significant increase in RGV when the runway time was ≤3 h. However, this finding needs to be interpreted with caution as there were only 17 patients in this group and such a magnitude of difference is unlikely to be clinically significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our study showed a mean RGV of 17.7 AE 19.2 mL, with a mean runway time of 5.8 AE 2.0 h, which is similar to that reported in multiple studies (20-25 mL), leading to major society guideline recommendations of a clear liquid intake of 200 mL/h for up to 2 h before the induction of anesthesia. 38 37 Unlike the later study, our data showed a statistically significant increase in RGV when the runway time was ≤3 h. However, this finding needs to be interpreted with caution as there were only 17 patients in this group and such a magnitude of difference is unlikely to be clinically significant.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Excluding PPIs, other medications have not been found to correlate with RGV. The effect of medications including PPIs is likely to be small, given that our data are similar to others where the medication intake was recorded, and this is unlikely to affect the validity of the results . The correlation between age and RGV independent of PPI therapy was also noted in a similar context …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The effect of medications including PPIs is likely to be small, given that our data are similar to others where the medication intake was recorded, and this is unlikely to affect the validity of the results. [35][36][37]48 The correlation between age and RGV independent of PPI therapy was also noted in a similar context. 44 Our study adds to the accumulating evidence that favors the intake of 1 L bowel preparation regimen containing PEG close to deep sedation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…A limited number of studies including 659 patients in total have shown that, the RGV after a mean runway time of 2-5 h did not differ significantly from that resulted from a longer runway time after splitdose colonoscopy preparation. [35][36][37] However, the optimal time between the last colonoscopy preparation agent intake and sedation for colonoscopy has not been defined and remains a matter of debate.…”
The consumption of bowel preparation agent within 3-4 h before propofol sedation resulted in a similar RGV and pH as those achieved by more prolonged fasting, with no increased risk of aspiration even in patients perceived to be at high risk.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.