2017
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5c3c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residual Gas and Dust around Transition Objects and Weak T Tauri Stars*

Abstract: Residual gas in disks around young stars can spin down stars, circularize the orbits of terrestrial planets, and whisk away the dusty debris that is expected to serve as a signpost of terrestrial planet formation. We have carried out a sensitive search for residual gas and dust in the terrestrial planet region surrounding young stars ranging in age from a few Myr to ∼ 10 Myr in age. Using high resolution 4.7µm spectra of transition objects and weak T Tauri stars, we searched for weak continuum excesses and CO … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even for an angular resolution of 0.3 , the molecular intensity profile never shows an actual cavity, indicating that some additional mechanism not included needs to reduce the CO emission from the very inner regions to reproduce the observations. Moreover, as discussed in Section 1, the low CO column densities in the inner disks of some transition disks are also probed by the modeling of CO vibrationally excited IR lines (Pontoppidan et al 2008;Carmona et al 2014Carmona et al , 2017van der Plas et al 2015;Banzatti & Pontoppidan 2015;Doppmann et al 2017); this thus corroborates the evidence of depletion of CO in the inner disk regions, which is not compatible with the gap scenario. If accretion onto the planet were included in the hydrodynamical simulations, the gas surface density in the inner regions would have been lower by a factor of a few at the most (e.g., Owen 2016, see their fig.…”
Section: Co Gap Versus Co Cavity: a Resolution Effect?mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Even for an angular resolution of 0.3 , the molecular intensity profile never shows an actual cavity, indicating that some additional mechanism not included needs to reduce the CO emission from the very inner regions to reproduce the observations. Moreover, as discussed in Section 1, the low CO column densities in the inner disks of some transition disks are also probed by the modeling of CO vibrationally excited IR lines (Pontoppidan et al 2008;Carmona et al 2014Carmona et al , 2017van der Plas et al 2015;Banzatti & Pontoppidan 2015;Doppmann et al 2017); this thus corroborates the evidence of depletion of CO in the inner disk regions, which is not compatible with the gap scenario. If accretion onto the planet were included in the hydrodynamical simulations, the gas surface density in the inner regions would have been lower by a factor of a few at the most (e.g., Owen 2016, see their fig.…”
Section: Co Gap Versus Co Cavity: a Resolution Effect?mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…For instance, a stellar mass is necessary to calculate the photoionization impacting the disk (Ercolano et al 2017). More significantly, Doppmann et al (2017) input effective temperatures and surface gravities to identify Moog models for M-band spectra to search for CO v=1-0 emission (and thus gas in the disk). The presence of residual gas would have implications for the disk dispersal timescales and the role of the gas in planet formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They postulated that instead of an extended disk or a grain size distribution, the disk consists of two spatially separated dust belts, one at ∼38 au and another at ∼75 au. They did not detect the [O I] emission in the PACS spectroscopic observations, and regarding CO, Doppmann et al (2017) did not detect any emission lines in highresolution 4.7 µm spectroscopic NIRSPEC observations. More recently, Holland et al (2017) also modeled the SED of TWA 7, with additional unresolved SCUBA-2 observations, and the best fit model suggests that there are two dust rings around the central star, one at 2.5 au and the other one at ∼49 au.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%