1992
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.27.2.124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residual Efficacy of Uniconazole and Daminozide on Potted `Bright Golden Anne' Chrysanthemum

Abstract: Residual activity of a single uniconazole spray (15 mg a.i./liter), uniconazole drench (600 μg a.i./pot), and daminozide spray (5000 mg a.i./liter) were compared to an untreated control using the `Bright Golden Anne' chrysanthemum [Dendranthema grandiflorum (Ramat.) Kitamura]. Based on weekly internode growth, spray and drench treatments with daminozide and uniconazole remained active for 2 to 2.5 and 3 to 3.5 weeks, respectively. Chemical names used: butanedioic acid mono (2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inhibition of stem elongation in herbaceous plants such as Chrysanthemum, Poinsettia, and annual bedding plants persists for only a few weeks after application of growth retardant. Stem elongation of Chrysanthemum gradually returned to control growth rates about 15 days after the application of ancymidol (Fisher et al 1996) or daminozide or uniconazole (Tayama and Carver 1992). The duration of the growth-retarding effect was roughly proportional to the concentration of regulator applied initially (Fisher et al 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inhibition of stem elongation in herbaceous plants such as Chrysanthemum, Poinsettia, and annual bedding plants persists for only a few weeks after application of growth retardant. Stem elongation of Chrysanthemum gradually returned to control growth rates about 15 days after the application of ancymidol (Fisher et al 1996) or daminozide or uniconazole (Tayama and Carver 1992). The duration of the growth-retarding effect was roughly proportional to the concentration of regulator applied initially (Fisher et al 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Because paclobutrazol and uniconazole have much greater dose-response coefficients, K c , than daminozide (Davis et al 1988), these triazole growth regulators can easily be applied at doses exceeding the range for linear response of stem elongation. This may explain why the effects of uniconazole lasted longer than those of daminozide in Chrysanthemum (Tayama and Carver 1992). Eight weeks after treatment, the height of bedding plants was reduced by high concentrations but not by low concentrations of uniconazole, whereas daminozide had no effect (Keever and Foster 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paclobutrazol had a persistent effect on stem elongation of rhododendron, in contrast to the recovery of growth of herbaceous plants. The latter generally grow out of the effect of an application of growth retardant in 4 to 6 weeks (Fisher et al, 1996;Keever and Foster, 1994;Latimer and Baden, 1992;Tayama and Carver, 1992). The response of rhododendron to a high dose of paclobutrazol decreases more slowly with time, over a period of years (Gent, 1997; Ranney et al, 1994;Wilkinson and Richards, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time for growth to recover to the rate of controls was proportional to growth retardant concentration. A similar time period was noted for recovery of growth of chrysanthemum from either a spray or drench application of uniconazole (Tayama and Carver, 1992). To estimate the recovery of growth of rhododendron after application of triazoles, an exponential decay with time was incorporated into the coeffi cient for the inverse relation of stem elongation to initial concentration of growth retardant (Gent 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The most appropriate form of g(t) is likely to vary depending on chemical type, translocation pathway, and plant species. Either Larsen and Lieth (1993) g(t) model may be appropriate for daminozide on chrysanthemum, because translocation and activity are rapid (Dicks, 1972) and the effect declines over time (Dicks, 1972;Dicks and Charles-Edwards, 1973;Tayama and Carver, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%