2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2005.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residual distribution for general time-dependent conservation laws

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(166 reference statements)
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This test case is contained in [17]. We use it to test the shock-capturing capabilities of the schemes.…”
Section: A 2d Riemann Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This test case is contained in [17]. We use it to test the shock-capturing capabilities of the schemes.…”
Section: A 2d Riemann Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the RD approach, this has been done by [11,17,34] to give a few examples. This leads to implicit schemes with possibly stability constraints.…”
Section: Unsteady Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to implicit schemes with possibly stability constraints. These stability constraints can be removed by a "two-layers" technique, see [34] and then [11] for details. A simpler method is described in [17], it uses discontinuous in time finite elements.…”
Section: Unsteady Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the temporal scheme used, the original RDS formulation cannot be more than first order accurate in timedependent computations due to the inconsistency of the spatial discretization (Ferrante and Deconinck [8]). Various solutions have been proposed to overeóme this difficulty; see, e.g., Ferrante and Deconinck [8] and Caraeni [2], who made use of a finite-element like mass-matrix that were consistent with the spatial discretization, and Ricchiuto et al [16] and Csik and Deconinck [4], who introduce space-time residual distribution schemes. But, all of these papers are focused on inviscid unsteady solutions, with non-steady viscous computation not conclusive (Caraeni et al [3]) and putting more emphasis on the numerical aspect of the method than in its real predictive capabilities for complex viscous flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%