2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00181-014-0822-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residual-based tests for cointegration with three-regime TAR adjustment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theorems given here are easily adapted to provide the asymptotic distributions for models without structural breaks using W xτ = (W x , 1) . Hence, the asymptotic distribution of their F -statistic using fixed threshold values and a SETAR model is given as a special case of Theorem 1 of this paper and as a special case (λ 1 = λ 2 ) of Theorem 2 inMaki and Kitasaka (2015). Theorem 2 is new in this context.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The theorems given here are easily adapted to provide the asymptotic distributions for models without structural breaks using W xτ = (W x , 1) . Hence, the asymptotic distribution of their F -statistic using fixed threshold values and a SETAR model is given as a special case of Theorem 1 of this paper and as a special case (λ 1 = λ 2 ) of Theorem 2 inMaki and Kitasaka (2015). Theorem 2 is new in this context.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The asymptotic distribution is derived by adapting the results of Gregory and Hansen (1992) to match the F -statistic process involving a threshold indicator function using results in Maki and Kitasaka (2015). However, Maki and Kitasaka (2015) use a different definition of the threshold parameter space in their SETAR model. The threshold parameter in our model is fixed, i.e.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the setting, includes equally spaced 100 points between the 5% and 45% quantiles of the arranged values and includes equally spaced 100 points between the 55% and 95% quantiles. This test is based on Maki (2009) and Maki and Kitasaka (2014). Table 1 shows the critical values of the tests.…”
Section: Methods Of the Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%