2015
DOI: 10.3923/ja.2015.247.250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residual Activity of 2,4-D Amine on Soybean Plant Development

Abstract: The objective of this research was to evaluate the residual effect of 2,4-D amine on the initial development of soybean plants after its application on the soil at different times before sowing. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse during the months from April to June 2013, at State University of Mato Grosso do Sul. The experimental design was completely randomized, with four replications. The treatments consisted of eight application times of herbicide 2,4-D amine, seven (3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 21 da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Khan et al [25] Reported that the shoot and root length of Triticum aestivum and Phalaris minor raised from seeds treated with different concentrations of 2,4 -D, decreased with the increase of 2,4-D concentration. Also, the application of 2,4-D near soybean sowing caused a decrease in shoots and root length [26]. Abelmoschus esculentus treated with 2,4-D at five rates (1-5 ppm) showed a reduction in shoot height and root length decreased after five days of treatment [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Khan et al [25] Reported that the shoot and root length of Triticum aestivum and Phalaris minor raised from seeds treated with different concentrations of 2,4 -D, decreased with the increase of 2,4-D concentration. Also, the application of 2,4-D near soybean sowing caused a decrease in shoots and root length [26]. Abelmoschus esculentus treated with 2,4-D at five rates (1-5 ppm) showed a reduction in shoot height and root length decreased after five days of treatment [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soybean is not resistant to 2,4-D and can cause crop injury and subsequent yield decline (Johnson et al 2012;de Oliveira et al 2015). Therefore, 2,4-D has the potential to cause unacceptable crop injury when the crop is seeded too soon after PRE application of this product.…”
Section: Soybean Biomass and Seed Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil persistence of 2,4-D and dicamba is influenced by several edaphoclimatic characteristics, which alter the rate of herbicide dissipation. Likewise, several reports from greenhouse studies document that is safe soybean planting 3 to 10 days before 2,4-D application (Silva et al 2011, Oliveira et al 2015, Peres-Oliveira et al 2016. There are no reporting in the literature of greenhouse studies about intervals of dicamba application and crop planting, only a study evaluating the effect of simulated rainfall and rates of dicamba applied seven days before soybean planting on the herbicide dissipation (Silva et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%