2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2004.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residents’ perceptions of walkability attributes in objectively different neighbourhoods: a pilot study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
189
3
16

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 335 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
14
189
3
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study that tested a modified version of the NEWS in a sample of 87 Australian adults, with an average difference of 12 days between the first and second questionnaires, showed coefficients varying from 0.62 to 0.88 13 . In comparison with environment specific items, the correlation coefficients obtained in this study were higher for structures and facilities (r icc =0.88 for the item of land use diversity in the Australian study), traffic safety (r icc =0.62 in the Australian study) and for general safety (r icc =0.63 in the Australian study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study that tested a modified version of the NEWS in a sample of 87 Australian adults, with an average difference of 12 days between the first and second questionnaires, showed coefficients varying from 0.62 to 0.88 13 . In comparison with environment specific items, the correlation coefficients obtained in this study were higher for structures and facilities (r icc =0.88 for the item of land use diversity in the Australian study), traffic safety (r icc =0.62 in the Australian study) and for general safety (r icc =0.63 in the Australian study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The built environment impacts transportation decisions via a feedback loop, marked "B" in Figure 2, as infrastructure available for walking has been shown to increase the likelihood of walking, 3,42,49 and increased local walking has been shown to provide support for improving the local walking infrastructure. 25 A third feedback loop, marked "C" in Figure 2, shows that the perception of the built environment, independent of the actual built environment, also interacts with transportation decisions as the perception that the built environment is walkable may increase the likelihood of walking, 1,37 and increased walking in an area may increase the perception that the area is walkable. 1,34 A final pathway relevant to this study is marked "D" on Figure 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many recent studies have shown that perception, as distinct from actual physical attributes of the built environment, may impact the decision to walk. 32 Perception of walkability can be influenced by the physical attributes of a neighborhood, 37 as well as local culture, crime or crime reporting, traffic accidents, and other non-physical attributes, and should be understood as being potentially distinct from physical attributes.…”
Section: Measurement and Reportingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is generally considered that a walkable neighborhood has well mixed land use, well-connected streets, and high residential density (Saelens et al 2003;Lake et al 2010). Most researchers have adopted the integrated walkability index including just these three elements (e.g., De Meester et al 2012;Marshall et al 2009;Owen et al 2007;Leslie et al 2005;Brown et al 2009). For example, Frank and colleagues (Frank et al , 2006(Frank et al , & 2010 had constructed one of the most popular indexes including these elements.…”
Section: The Walkability Index (Wi)mentioning
confidence: 99%