2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residents’ perceptions of Royal Bardia National Park, Nepal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
49
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
5
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The external cause was that they complained of unfair treatment under conservation policy, which seemed to place limitations only on residents, while other stakeholders were excluded, a situation opposite to previous promises. This phenomenon also appeared in Royal Bardia National Park because non-governmental organizations enjoyed preferential treatment from management while residents did not [37].…”
Section: Divergence In Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The external cause was that they complained of unfair treatment under conservation policy, which seemed to place limitations only on residents, while other stakeholders were excluded, a situation opposite to previous promises. This phenomenon also appeared in Royal Bardia National Park because non-governmental organizations enjoyed preferential treatment from management while residents did not [37].…”
Section: Divergence In Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Studies in Australia [22], Nepal [23], Norway [24], Mexico [25], Indonesia [26] and USA [27] revealed local inhabitants appreciating areas for their aesthetic and spiritual values as well as environmental products and economic and leisure opportunities. Mexican farmers in particular value the land for its provision of food, water, wood and other products, and they have developed farming styles along a spectrum of reciprocal relationships between man and nature between wilderness and urbanisation [28].…”
Section: Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substantial research on the attitudes of local residents towards protected areas has been conducted in various countries [14][15][16][17][18][19]. Negative attitudes are frequently associated with situations where the perceived costs to individuals and communities outweigh the perceived benefits [20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%