Residential satisfaction close to highways: The impact of accessibility, nuisances and highway adjustment projects

Abstract

In this paper we focus on gaining insight into the residential satisfaction of households near highways, based on survey data collected among 1,225 respondents in the Netherlands living within 1,000 meters from a highway. Ordinal regression was used to study the impact of highway externalities on residential satisfaction. Moreover, we gained first insights into the reactions of people on highway adjustment projects, by studying people's expectations towards residential satisfaction as a consequence of the project with use of a multinomial logistic regression analysis. On average, 85 percent of respondents reported being satisfied with living near a highway. Regarding explanatory characteristics, subjective evaluations of air and noise nuisance and of accessibility are of comparable importance and seem to outperform objective exposure calculations or distance from the highway or access lane in explaining residential satisfaction. Moreover highway interest is directly reflected in a higher satisfaction. However, other factors such as neighborhood design, traffic safety and social cohesion are important as well. People react differently to highway adjustment plans, negative expectations being highly driven by current negative feelings towards nuisance, and positive expectations by personal interest in accessibility and a positive attitude towards cars. An important implication could be the notion that exposure is not the same as perceived nuisance, which may give reason to be cautious when making transportation planning decisions based solely on calculations. In addition, the finding that other (neighborhood) factors are also very important in explaining residential satisfaction is interesting when thinking about compensating for the negative effects of a highway in the neighborhood. Also, the results regarding reactions to an announced highway adjustment project might be used to better adjust the planning process to the characteristics of the residents in the area. Further research is necessary to deepen the results, for example through the addition of other road project locations, interviews and longitudinal data.Keywords: highway infrastructure planning, accessibility, nuisance, residential satisfaction, planned highway adjustment projects. Highlights We studied the impact of negative (nuisance) and positive (accessibility) highway externalities and a highway adjustment project on residential satisfaction near highways.  Perceived nuisance and accessibility influence residential satisfaction, but other neighborhood factors are also important.  Perceptions of accessibility and nuisance outweigh objective measures (exposure levels, distance from highway/accesslane).  Highway users show a higher satisfaction level.  Expectations towards highway adjustment projects are mixed; highway users and people who like driving in particular have more positive expectations, currently hindered people more negative expectations.3

Revealing Social Values by 3D City Visualization in City Transformations

“…They also confirmed that proximity to roads had no effect, in contrast to previous findings [41]. However, the negative effects recorded in the cited study may be balanced by satisfaction associated with the increases in accessibility offered by major roads [44,45]. If so, planners may be able to reduce or even eliminate dissatisfaction associated with living close to a major road by mitigating adverse factors such as noise and enhancing positive factors such as access to them.…”

Toll Roads in Indonesia: Transport System, Accessibility, Spatial and Equity Impacts

“…For instance, distance to the toll gate has a negative coefficient, indicating that the closer the respondents live to the toll gate, the more satisfied they are with their current neighbourhood. This result is in line with the results of the study of Hamersma, Tillema, Sussman, and Arts (2014), who found that 85% of Dutch respondents were satisfied with living within 1 km of a highway. However, respondents in the Jakarta-Bandung region are less satisfied with the current housing conditions if they live close to the toll gate.…”

Dealing with interrelatedness and fragmentation in road infrastructure planning: an analysis of integrated approaches throughout the planning process in the Netherlands

“…Conflicts between road infrastructure and other spatial functions, such as housing, nature and recreation, are generally acknowledged. Examples of such conflicts are negative externalities such as noise, air pollution and safety issues (Banister, Anderton, Bonilla, Givoni, & Schwanen, 2011;Hamersma, Tillema, Sussman, & Arts, 2014). Consequent ways of responding for planning and decision-making, such as protection and mitigation, are much explored.…”