2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residential open space and the perception of health benefits: How much is the public willing to pay?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the richness of plants and increasing vegetative cover to improve structural diversity help to improve the biodiversity of residential communities [50]. Residents were willing to pay for plants in their residential communities [32].…”
Section: Visual Quality Of Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the richness of plants and increasing vegetative cover to improve structural diversity help to improve the biodiversity of residential communities [50]. Residents were willing to pay for plants in their residential communities [32].…”
Section: Visual Quality Of Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study regarding the cultural ecosystem services of residential green spaces showed that residential green spaces can effectively compensate for the lack of nearby parks in residential areas [31]. To study public understanding of and demand for the health benefits of residential open space, a contingent valuation of 1348 respondents in China was conducted to evaluate the perceived monetary value of different residential landscape elements, such as plants and activity areas [32]. However, resident attitudes, perceptions, and satisfaction towards the residential communities' landscape environment in terms of functions, aesthetics, and ecology have not been widely explored, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Public intention to bear such cost is dependent on pro-environmental willingness to pay (WTP) (Herbes et al. , 2015), which reflects the perceived monetary value (or anticipated benefits) of environmental management (Luo et al. , 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible route to address such substantial cost is sharing the cost with the public (Ananno et al, 2021), for example, via green taxes, which are considered effective and efficient in covering the expenditure of public environmental management (Nguyen et al, 2016). Public intention to bear such cost is dependent on proenvironmental willingness to pay (WTP) (Herbes et al, 2015), which reflects the perceived monetary value (or anticipated benefits) of environmental management (Luo et al, 2022). Potentially, this type of WTP could be affected by green advertising, because such advertisements can effectively boost environmental awareness (Kao and Du, 2020), which has been found to have a positive relation with pro-environmental WTP (Xu et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%