2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residential greenness and allergic respiratory diseases in children and adolescents – A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
63
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
63
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in that analysis, only three studies reported NDVI in the same buffer (100 m) to qualify for meta‐analysis (I 2 = 68%, p = .02). This supports the suggestion that standardization of NDVI measurement would aid in future meta‐analyses (Lambert et al, ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in that analysis, only three studies reported NDVI in the same buffer (100 m) to qualify for meta‐analysis (I 2 = 68%, p = .02). This supports the suggestion that standardization of NDVI measurement would aid in future meta‐analyses (Lambert et al, ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Among seven studies reviewed, six reported no direct association between greenness and child asthma, while one reported increased greenness protective of asthma. When findings of this review are considered with findings of the review by Lambert et al (), who found two articles showing benefit of greenness for child asthma, two articles showing a detrimental relationship, and four articles showing no relationship, it seems a direct relationship either does not exist or has not been accurately measured. No studies included here found a negative direct association between greenness and child asthma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…New Evidence In the context of asthma, studies suggest that greenspace could increase exposure to microbial antigens that may impact immune system development, counteract environmental pollution of urban communities, and mediate family relationship stress [82][83][84]. Despite these hypotheses, there are inconsistent associations with greenspace and asthma [85][86][87]. Two meta-analyses demonstrated a non-significant trend toward reduced asthma incidence in areas with higher greenspace, though they are limited by heterogeneity [85,87].…”
Section: Intermediary Determinantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these hypotheses, there are inconsistent associations with greenspace and asthma [85][86][87]. Two meta-analyses demonstrated a non-significant trend toward reduced asthma incidence in areas with higher greenspace, though they are limited by heterogeneity [85,87]. Factors that may account for the inconsistencies among studies include seasonality and the timing of the exposure (e.g., perhaps early life exposures are beneficial for immune system development, but after atopy has developed, allergen exposures could precipitate worse control).…”
Section: Intermediary Determinantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Few studies indicate protective effects of residential greenness on respiratory health, 28 and COPD 29 in particular. Evidence for asthma, allergic rhinitis, and aeroallergen sensitisation (thus far mostly among children) has been inconsistent 30 with some studies reporting protective effects, 31 as well as null, 32 or non-beneficial associations. 33,34 The evidence associating environmental exposures with COPD thus far has been inconclusive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%