Residential exposure to natural outdoor environments and general health among older adults in Shanghai, China

Abstract

BackgroundExposure to natural outdoor environments (NOE) has been shown to be beneficial to older adults’ health and functioning, yet this assertion has rarely been tested in China. We investigated the relationships between exposure to NOE and older adults’ self-rated health in Shanghai, China and examined whether these relationships varied by sex, age, education and hukou status.MethodThis cross-sectional study used micro-data sample of the 2010 Shanghai population census, including 7962 older adults nested within 3345 neighbourhoods. Self-rated health was the outcome variable. Four NOE exposure indicators were calculated for each neighbourhood: the amount of surrounding greenness/blueness and proximity to large green/blue spaces. Multilevel logistic regression was employed to explore the association between natural outdoor environment exposure and self-rated health, adjusting for individual-level and neighbourhood-level covariates. Stratified analyses were used to examine variations by sex, age, education and hukou status.ResultsOlder adults living in neighbourhoods with higher surrounding greenness and higher proximity to both green spaces and blue spaces were more likely to report good health. Residential surrounding blueness was not significantly related to self-rated health. Females, those aged 60–69 years, those who had elementary school or junior high school education and those with non-local hukou benefit more from residential surrounding greenness, and those aged 70–79 years and who had elementary school or junior high school education benefit more from residential proximity to blue spaces.ConclusionsHigher residential greenness and proximity to both green spaces and blue spaces were associated with better self-rated health, particularly for females, younger older adults, the low educated and non-local hukou holders. Our findings suggest that urban green spaces and urban blue spaces have different effects on health among Chinese older adults and that the assessment of exposure matters to the investigation of NOE-health relationships.

A Review of Advancement on Influencing Factors of Acne: An Emphasis on Environment Characteristics

“…According to a study in South Africa, each participant was assigned a value for a green living space, which was obtained from a normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) generated by a satellite based on the global positioning system (GPS) coordinates of their household location (110). Liu et al suggested sufficient green infrastructure at the neighborhood scale could protect against depression and promote mental well-being in Chinese urban settings (145)(146)(147)(148)(149)(150). Furthermore, green space may be associated with decreased risk of excess weight/obesity (151)(152)(153).…”

The Beneficial Effects of Short-Term Exposure to Scuba Diving on Human Mental Health

“…A growing number of studies suggest that exposure to natural outdoor environments can help improve human health and wellbeing by reducing stress, encouraging social relationships, and increasing physical activity [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ]. The majority of these studies have focused on the benefits of doing outdoor activities in green spaces [ 5 , 6 ], indicating that this improves mental wellbeing and cognitive functioning [ 7 , 8 ].…”

Green and Blue Space Availability and Self-Rated Health among Seniors in China: Evidence from a National Survey

“…Compared with the widely acknowledged health-promoting benefits of green spaces, studies concerning blue spaces are growing, yet remain scarce. Despite the recognition of the effects of blue space on people’s health, research on blue spaces has revealed largely mixed results due to varying scales, health indicators, definitions of blue space, and approaches to the measurement of blue spaces [ 18 , 19 , 20 ]. Similar to green space, the presence of blue space can also serve as an environmental harm reduction.…”

“…Research relies on place-based or people-based indicators for the availability of green/blue spaces around people [ 34 ]. To measure the quantity of green/blue space, a large number of studies use indices generated from satellite-based images (e.g., the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index), and green/blue space volume, calculated using surveyed land-use maps at various scales (e.g., ground level visibility, buffer from home, community, neighborhood, and county borders) [ 1 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 31 , 35 , 36 ]. Another popular measurement is proximity to green/blue space by closest linear distance or road network-based distance [ 18 , 37 ].…”

“…To measure the quantity of green/blue space, a large number of studies use indices generated from satellite-based images (e.g., the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index), and green/blue space volume, calculated using surveyed land-use maps at various scales (e.g., ground level visibility, buffer from home, community, neighborhood, and county borders) [ 1 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 31 , 35 , 36 ]. Another popular measurement is proximity to green/blue space by closest linear distance or road network-based distance [ 18 , 37 ]. Because place-based indicators only reflect green/blue space availability objectively [ 37 ], researchers have begun to capture how people actually visit them, through observing on-site usability, interviewing people’s usage habits, tracing visitors’ movement with GPS or relying on highly aggregated geolocation data (e.g., cellphone or Twitter locations) [ 24 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ].…”