2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residential demand response: Experimental evaluation and comparison of self-organizing techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be noticed that P‐MARL agents lead to a much smoother overall grid demand, as they adapt to the baseload and intermittent wind availability, and thus avoid generating peaks in demand. In fact, the performance obtained by P‐MARL is near‐optimal with respect to the demand‐smoothing target, in line with the optimal valley‐filling algorithm presented in Dusparic et al The comparison in Dusparic et al presents the evaluation of a number of solutions on a similar problem. The near‐optimal performance of P‐MARL while considering sequential agent actions has been previously demonstrated in and is an outcome of the predictive analytics and simulated environment modules of P‐MARL.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Dr Algorithmsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be noticed that P‐MARL agents lead to a much smoother overall grid demand, as they adapt to the baseload and intermittent wind availability, and thus avoid generating peaks in demand. In fact, the performance obtained by P‐MARL is near‐optimal with respect to the demand‐smoothing target, in line with the optimal valley‐filling algorithm presented in Dusparic et al The comparison in Dusparic et al presents the evaluation of a number of solutions on a similar problem. The near‐optimal performance of P‐MARL while considering sequential agent actions has been previously demonstrated in and is an outcome of the predictive analytics and simulated environment modules of P‐MARL.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Dr Algorithmsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The near‐optimal performance of P‐MARL while considering sequential agent actions has been previously demonstrated in and is an outcome of the predictive analytics and simulated environment modules of P‐MARL. This outperforms the solutions presented in Dusparic et al, as it is not only closer to optimal but also presents much smoother demand patterns on aggregate.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Dr Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Decentralized algorithms distribute decision-making at the local level and allow communication between agents for coordination [ 25 ] or learning [ 26 ]. In this paper, we focus on localized algorithms, a type of decentralized algorithms that operate only on local knowledge, without assuming the availability of specialized hardware for communication [ 27 ].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Contribution Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, localized algorithms empower the users to choose autonomously about their own actions and to keep ownership of data. A more in-depth comparison of centralized and decentralized algorithms is provided in [ 26 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distintas innovaciones tecnológicas entre los cuales tenemos: los vehículos eléctricos de batería, vehículos eléctricos híbridos y vehículos de pila de combustible de hidrógeno [6], la alta posibilidad y riesgo de degradación de las baterías, es decir, la vida útil de la batería se acorta cada vez más dependiendo de la relación de carga y descarga que se realice.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified