Abstract:Introduction:
Interest in clinical rotations in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has grown among high-income country (HIC) orthopaedic residents. This study addresses the following questions: (1) What motivates HIC surgical residents to rotate in LMICs? (2) What is the impact of rotations on HIC residents? (3) What are the LMIC partner perceptions of HIC collaboration?
Materials and Methods:
A search strategy of multiple databases returned 3,740 unique articles pert… Show more
“…I nstitutional review board approval for the study was obtained. A previous survey (see Appendix B) evaluating the impact of visiting orthopaedic residents as perceived by the LMIC hosting orthopaedic surgeons and trainees 9 and relevant peer-reviewed literature 5,[10][11][12][13] were used to design a semistructured interview guide (see Appendix C). A portion of the guide was focused on exploring the perceived impact of visiting residents, including the impact on patient care, orthopaedic education, and interpersonal experiences, and the remainder was focused on seeking recommendations for improving these rotations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies on visiting resident rotations have been limited to the high-income country (HIC) perspective, and the impact of such rotations on surgeons and trainees in LMICs has not been well studied 5 . While potential benefits for LMIC hosts include academic exchange and addressing a gap in care, reported downsides include cross-cultural conflict, unintended interference with established systems, and care vacuums that are unintentionally created after rotations end 3,[6][7][8] .…”
Background: International orthopaedic resident rotations in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) are gaining popularity among high-income country (HIC) residency programs. While evidence demonstrates a benefit for the visiting residents, few studies have evaluated the impact of such rotations on the orthopaedic surgeons and trainees in LMICs. The purpose of this study was to further explore themes identified in a previous survey study regarding the local impact of visiting HIC resident rotations.Methods: Using a semistructured interview guide, LMIC surgeons and trainees who had hosted HIC orthopaedic residents within the previous 10 years were interviewed until thematic saturation was reached.Results: Twenty attending and resident orthopaedic surgeons from 8 LMICs were interviewed. Positive and negative effects of the visiting residents on clinical care, education, interpersonal relationships, and resource availability were identified. Seven recommendations for visiting resident rotations were highlighted, including a 1 to 2-month rotation length; visiting residents at the senior training level; site-specific prerotation orientation with an emphasis on resident attitudes, including the need for humility; creation of bidirectional opportunities; partnering with institutions with local training programs; and fostering mutually beneficial sustained relationships.Conclusions: This study explores the perspectives of those who host visiting residents, a viewpoint that is underrepresented in the literature. Future research regarding HIC orthopaedic resident rotations in LMICs should include the perspectives of local surgeons and trainees to strive for mutually beneficial experiences to further strengthen and sustain such academic partnerships.Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJS/H127).
“…I nstitutional review board approval for the study was obtained. A previous survey (see Appendix B) evaluating the impact of visiting orthopaedic residents as perceived by the LMIC hosting orthopaedic surgeons and trainees 9 and relevant peer-reviewed literature 5,[10][11][12][13] were used to design a semistructured interview guide (see Appendix C). A portion of the guide was focused on exploring the perceived impact of visiting residents, including the impact on patient care, orthopaedic education, and interpersonal experiences, and the remainder was focused on seeking recommendations for improving these rotations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies on visiting resident rotations have been limited to the high-income country (HIC) perspective, and the impact of such rotations on surgeons and trainees in LMICs has not been well studied 5 . While potential benefits for LMIC hosts include academic exchange and addressing a gap in care, reported downsides include cross-cultural conflict, unintended interference with established systems, and care vacuums that are unintentionally created after rotations end 3,[6][7][8] .…”
Background: International orthopaedic resident rotations in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) are gaining popularity among high-income country (HIC) residency programs. While evidence demonstrates a benefit for the visiting residents, few studies have evaluated the impact of such rotations on the orthopaedic surgeons and trainees in LMICs. The purpose of this study was to further explore themes identified in a previous survey study regarding the local impact of visiting HIC resident rotations.Methods: Using a semistructured interview guide, LMIC surgeons and trainees who had hosted HIC orthopaedic residents within the previous 10 years were interviewed until thematic saturation was reached.Results: Twenty attending and resident orthopaedic surgeons from 8 LMICs were interviewed. Positive and negative effects of the visiting residents on clinical care, education, interpersonal relationships, and resource availability were identified. Seven recommendations for visiting resident rotations were highlighted, including a 1 to 2-month rotation length; visiting residents at the senior training level; site-specific prerotation orientation with an emphasis on resident attitudes, including the need for humility; creation of bidirectional opportunities; partnering with institutions with local training programs; and fostering mutually beneficial sustained relationships.Conclusions: This study explores the perspectives of those who host visiting residents, a viewpoint that is underrepresented in the literature. Future research regarding HIC orthopaedic resident rotations in LMICs should include the perspectives of local surgeons and trainees to strive for mutually beneficial experiences to further strengthen and sustain such academic partnerships.Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJS/H127).
“…They also emphasise that, âthe continuity of student presence provided by a partnership allows more comprehensive student preparationâ, and that the preparation of students for electives, âis easier to organise and of more direct relevance for groups of students who are going to the same place as part of an institutional partnershipâ [ 24 ]. In short, a stable relationship with the host institution helps prepare residents for the elective experience and can lessen the potential concerns relating to host institutions in LMICs [ 26 , 27 ]. We reviewed over two-hundred articles on international medical electives, and to the best of our knowledge, there has been no systematic analysis of how institutions that provide residents begin their involvement with international medical electives.…”
Background
Mainstream medical education remains largely focused on national health issues. Therefore, in order to expose medical students to international health issues, it is beneficial to facilitate international medical electives.
Methods
This article describes the Junior Project Officer (JPO) program, a medical experience based on clinical electives in Sub-Saharan Africa, supported by a Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO). Residents spend 6 months as part of a multidisciplinary medical team in Africa. A post-elective online survey was administered to all who participated in the program in the period 2002â2020. The questionnaire comprised three domains: (i) general and pre-departure information; (ii) the experience; (iii) the post-experience.
Results
Questionnaires were received from 157/241 subjects, a response rate of 65%. The most common specialties were pediatrics, public health, and internal medicine. Of all, 87% carried out clinical activities; 45% also worked in the management of health services, and 60% carried out research activities. About 64% reported difficulties linked to a lack of equipment, different ways of working (57%), and exposure to situations for which they did not feel technically prepared (56%). In 25% of cases, residents reported that their schoolâs attitude to their doing the elective was not positive: upon their return, over 50% felt that their experience was not sufficiently valued by their institution. Respondents considered the experience important for professional and personal growth (93% and 80% respectively ). Forty-two participants (27%) reported that the experience had a significant impact on their future career choices.
Conclusion
Despite the difficulties encountered, a well-structured experience in international health can have a positive impact on residents, professionally and personally. Key factors behind the positive outcomes are the substantial length (6 months) of the experience, and the long term working relationships between the sending and receiving institutions. The schools in Italy that provide the students for the electives need to see more evidence that international electives are worth the investment.
“…Even fewer have assessed host trainee perspectives or host perspectives related to global surgery experiences [35][36][37]. A recent qualitative meta-ethnography assessing resident rotations in LMIC identified only 4 studies assessing host perspectives of HIC collaboration with a combined total of 25 LMIC surgeons and 20 LMIC surgical trainees represented in these studies [38][39][40][41][42].…”
Background
As globalization of surgical training increases, growing evidence demonstrates a positive impact of global surgery experiences on trainees from high-income countries (HIC). However, few studies have assessed the impact of these largely unidirectional experiences from the perspectives of host surgical personnel from low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). This study aimed to assess the impact of unidirectional visitor involvement from the perspectives of host surgical personnel in Kijabe, Kenya.
Methods
Voluntary semi-structured interviews were conducted with 43 host surgical personnel at a tertiary referral hospital in Kijabe, Kenya. Qualitative analysis was used to identify salient and recurring themes related to host experiences with visiting surgical personnel. Perceived benefits and challenges of HIC involvement and host interest in bidirectional exchange were assessed.
Results
Benefits of visitor involvement included positive learning experiences (95.3%), capacity building (83.7%), exposure to diverse practices and perspectives (74.4%), improved work ethic (51.2%), shared workload (44.2%), access to resources (41.9%), visitor contributions to patient care (41.9%), and mentorship opportunities (37.2%). Challenges included short stays (86.0%), visitor adaptation and integration (83.7%), cultural differences (67.4%), visitors with problematic behaviors (53.5%), learner saturation (34.9%), language barriers (32.6%), and perceived power imbalances between HIC and LMIC personnel (27.9%). Nearly half of host participants expressed concerns about the lack of balanced exchange between HIC and LMIC programs (48.8%). Almost all (96.9%) host trainees expressed interest in a bidirectional exchange program.
Conclusion
As the field of global surgery continues to evolve, further assessment and representation of host perspectives is necessary to identify and address challenges and promote equitable, mutually beneficial partnerships between surgical programs in HIC and LMIC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citationsâcitations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.