2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-014-0657-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resident plant diversity and introduced earthworms have contrasting effects on the success of invasive plants

Abstract: Theoretical predictions and empirical studies suggest that resident species diversity is an important driver of community invasibility. Through trait-based processes, plants in communities with high resident species diversity occupy a wider range of ecological niches and are more productive than low diversity communities, potentially reducing the opportunities for invasion through niche preemption. In terrestrial plant communities, biotic ecosystem engineers such as earthworms can also affect invasibility Keyw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(94 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plant species that coevolved in the presence of earthworms, that is plant species of European and Asian origin, could have adaptations that confer tolerance to the presence of earthworms. Non-native plant species may be adapted to similar soil conditions as those found in earthworm-invaded forests, such as high soil pH and sparse litter cover (Nuzzo et al, 2009;Beaus ejour et al, 2014;Whitfeld et al, 2014). The bioturbation of the forest floor associated with earthworm invasion also may favor non-native plant species without obligate mycorrhizal associations (Lawrence et al, 2003;Paudel et al, 2016).…”
Section: Changes In Plant Community Composition: Native Versus Non-namentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plant species that coevolved in the presence of earthworms, that is plant species of European and Asian origin, could have adaptations that confer tolerance to the presence of earthworms. Non-native plant species may be adapted to similar soil conditions as those found in earthworm-invaded forests, such as high soil pH and sparse litter cover (Nuzzo et al, 2009;Beaus ejour et al, 2014;Whitfeld et al, 2014). The bioturbation of the forest floor associated with earthworm invasion also may favor non-native plant species without obligate mycorrhizal associations (Lawrence et al, 2003;Paudel et al, 2016).…”
Section: Changes In Plant Community Composition: Native Versus Non-namentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive associations between invasive earthworms and invasive plants (Heneghan et al, 2007;Nuzzo et al, 2009;Whitfeld et al, 2014) suggest facilitative interactions between both groups. Studies at invasion fronts indicate that earthworm invasion precedes and facilitates invasion by three non-native forest plants [ (Nuzzo et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the presence of deer, unpalatable species produce higher biomass or show increased population growth rates (Eschtruth and Battles, 2009a;Kalisz et al, 2014). Target non-natives are also positively associated with earthworms (Nuzzo et al, 2009;Whitfeld et al, 2014) and, in fact, rarely occur at high densities at sites with low earthworm abundance (personal observation). Considering that these stressors co-occur and that mounting evidence indicates that populations and impacts of invasive plants, earthworms and deer are characterized by complex non-additive interactions (Waller and Maas, 2013;Dávalos et al, 2014;Flory and Bauer, 2014) it is paramount to quantify their combined effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an understanding of the controls on the germination and initial establishment of buckthorn remains limited. It has been proposed that earthworms facilitate the invasion of buckthorn, but to our knowledge, there is little experimental evidence to support this prediction (Whitfeld et al 2014b). In the following sections we discuss how the results contribute to a better understanding of our three main questions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%