2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2010.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resident cardiac progenitor cells: At the heart of regeneration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
90
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
2
90
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…After injury, the heart muscle displays very limited regeneration, in which resident cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) seem to play a role. [1] Despite their acknowledged regenerative potential, [2][3][4] very little is known about the actual role of CPCs, particularly of human origin, in cardiac repair and regeneration. Among the different CPC populations that have been identified, human cardiomyocyte progenitor cells (CMPCs) represent a promising candidate for cardiac regeneration, due to their presence in fetal and adult heart, and the capacity to differentiate into the three cardiac lineages (cardiomyocytes, endothelial, and smooth muscle cells).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After injury, the heart muscle displays very limited regeneration, in which resident cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) seem to play a role. [1] Despite their acknowledged regenerative potential, [2][3][4] very little is known about the actual role of CPCs, particularly of human origin, in cardiac repair and regeneration. Among the different CPC populations that have been identified, human cardiomyocyte progenitor cells (CMPCs) represent a promising candidate for cardiac regeneration, due to their presence in fetal and adult heart, and the capacity to differentiate into the three cardiac lineages (cardiomyocytes, endothelial, and smooth muscle cells).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies in the field ofcell therapy have shown new therapeutic potentials in the treatment of cardiac disease [27]. Previous studies had shown that various stem cell resources such as; bone marrow (BM-MSCs) [28], Embryonic (ESCs) [29], adipose tissue (ADCs) [12,30], cardiac (CSCs) [31] and umbilical cord blood stem cells (UCBSCs) [32] have beneficial effects on the restoration of cardiac function after MI, but practical application of these sources is limited. Low cell yields, invasive collection procedure, long culture periods, ethical issues and the risk of recipient immune reaction are but a few of the associated problems that prove to be serious and troublesome barriers in choosing a sufficient stem cell source.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They demonstrated that c-kit+ CPC express the receptor for HMGB1 and that treatment increased the number of c-kit+ cells in mouse heart. Thymosine Beta4 has been shown to stimulate epicardial-derived cells (EPDC) to migrate and potentially promote neovascularization in the infarcted mouse heart (Smart et al, 2010); see review by (Bollini et al, 2011). Although there was no proof that EPDC were a source of the new cardiomyocytes, they may facilitate collateral vessel growth and thereby support the cardiomyocyte regeneration process.…”
Section: Alternatives To Cell Delivery: "Activation" Of Resident Cpcmentioning
confidence: 99%