1992
DOI: 10.1016/0260-8774(92)90071-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residence time distribution of food suspensions containing large particles when flowing in tubular systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of particle concentration on particle MNRT in tube flow has been reported in the literature (Abdelrahim et al, 1997;Alhamdan & Sastry, 1997;Palmieri et al, 1992;Salengke & Sastry, 1996;Sandeep & Zuritz, 1991). Sandeep and Zuritz (1991) found an increasing trend of the particle MNRT in a straight tube as the particle concentration increased for the particle concentration range of 1-5%.…”
Section: Mean Normalized Particle Residence Time (Mnrt)mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The influence of particle concentration on particle MNRT in tube flow has been reported in the literature (Abdelrahim et al, 1997;Alhamdan & Sastry, 1997;Palmieri et al, 1992;Salengke & Sastry, 1996;Sandeep & Zuritz, 1991). Sandeep and Zuritz (1991) found an increasing trend of the particle MNRT in a straight tube as the particle concentration increased for the particle concentration range of 1-5%.…”
Section: Mean Normalized Particle Residence Time (Mnrt)mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Sandeep and Zuritz (1991) found an increasing trend of the particle MNRT in a straight tube as the particle concentration increased for the particle concentration range of 1-5%. At a higher level of particle concentration (10-30%), Palmieri et al (1992) and Alhamdan and Sastry (1997) found that the MNRT decreased with an increase in particle concentration. In this study, the effect of particle concentration was found insignificant (P = 0.0585) at 95% confidence level.…”
Section: Mean Normalized Particle Residence Time (Mnrt)mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The expected advantages of a continuous process are an increase in production capacity, a reduction in power consumption, an improved treatment homogeneity and a conservation of the integrity of particles. However, microbial safety and nutritional quality of liquid-solid mixtures being functions of time and temperature in the aseptic processing system, Residence Time Distribution (RTD) and heat transfer studies have been carried out by many authors (Aströ m & Bark, 1994;Chandarana, 1992;Dutta & Sastry, 1990a, 1990bEliot-Godereaux, Fairhurst, Goullieux, & Pain, 2001;Fairhust & Pain, 1999;Palmieri, Cacae, Dipollian, & DallÕaglio, 1992;Sastry, 1992Sastry, , 1993Zaboubi, 1995) using real food particles such as carrots or potato cubes or model particles often made of alginate. In continuous process, hydraulic and thermal phenomena will be closely associated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%