The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.23374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Residence rule flexibility and descent groups dynamics shape uniparental genetic diversities in South East Asia

Abstract: The observed lack of signature of patrilocality on Y chromosome patterns might be attributed to the higher residence flexibility in the studied patrilocal populations, thus providing a potential explanation for the apparent discrepancies between social and genetic structures. Altogether, this study highlights the need to quantify the actual residence and descent patterns to fit social to genetic structures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(65 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are common patterns in human populations [31,44,47], and likely reflect a predominant patrilocal residence pattern and higher levels of female migration [48][49][50], a greater variance in reproductive success for males than for females [49,51], and male-specific cultural inheritance of fitness [31]. A recent study of MSEA populations supports the negative influence of clan fission and extinction dynamics on Y-chromosome effective population size in patrilineal societies [52]. Strikingly, the Pathen (HM) mtDNA and MSY effective population sizes were about the same.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…These are common patterns in human populations [31,44,47], and likely reflect a predominant patrilocal residence pattern and higher levels of female migration [48][49][50], a greater variance in reproductive success for males than for females [49,51], and male-specific cultural inheritance of fitness [31]. A recent study of MSEA populations supports the negative influence of clan fission and extinction dynamics on Y-chromosome effective population size in patrilineal societies [52]. Strikingly, the Pathen (HM) mtDNA and MSY effective population sizes were about the same.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…As discussed in the introduction, local endogamy is probably not the only coping mechanism to the matrilineal puzzle; for example, one of the brothers could escape from the matrilocal rule, allowing him to stay in his natal village (with his wife coming from the same or from a different village) and deal with his descent-group matters [5]. However, our ethno-demographic data do not support such an alternative coping mechanism to the matrilineal puzzle in the Southeast Asian populations under study, since the matrilineal and matrilocal populations followed their residence rule more strictly than the patrilineal and patrilocal populations under study [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As residence patterns were always somewhat flexible (Ly et al, ) and have become more fluid in recent years, both due to policy changes and increased tourism (Mattison, ), this enables us to consider the individuals ancestral residence pattern (based on their ethnic group) in addition to the way in which they are currently living. The intragenomic conflict hypothesis predicts that ancestral residence pattern should be influential over menopause timing and symptoms (Úbeda et al, ), however, if current residence pattern better predicts variation in menopause timing and symptoms, then it would suggest something else is responsible for the diversity we see in the menopausal transition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most Chinese kinship systems, males never disperse, but there is some variation in female dispersal: in patrilineal groups females disperse at marriage, whereas in matrilineal groups they usually stay in their natal households and live under a duolocal residence pattern, where neither males nor females disperse. However, there is always variability in residence patterns around the norm (Ly et al, ), and many women who are ancestrally duolocal no longer live in this way due to cultural change in the region (Ji et al, ; Mattison, ); therefore, we collected data on current residence pattern as well. This second variable allows us to attempt to capture whether the ancestral or current residence pattern is more influential over the menopausal transition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%