Reshuffling the global R&D deck, 1980-2050

Abstract

Based on more recent science spending developments in countries such as China, Korea, India and Brazil, there is a growing sense that the world’s scientific deck of cards is in the midst of a major reshuffle. But it is not clear if this reordering is limited to just the top spenders, or, indeed, how these changes have been playing out over the longer term. The new, more comprehensive research and development (R&D) spending estimates presented and discussed here reveal that we are in the midst of a possibly game-changing, albeit partial and perhaps irregular, reshuffle of the global R&D deck. These changes have potentially profound domestic and international economic development implications over the medium to long term. Notably, the fortunes of many of the world’s poorer countries continue to look bleak. Using the evolving structure of past R&D spending to project forward, and absent marked changes in science policies and spending priorities, we foresee a continuing and substantial shift in the geography of R&D towards parts of Asia, along with a continuing large, and in many respects growing, gap between the world’s scientific haves and have-nots.

One CGIAR and the Integrated Agri-food Systems Initiative: From short-termism to transformation of the world’s food systems

“…Yet, many innovation and governance systems are weakly suited to handle current and emerging agrifood challenges [24,25]. Investment in supportive international institutions has not kept pace with the need for collaborative innovation focused simultaneously on productivity, health, and resilience [26][27][28]. The perennial impediment of weak local capacity for implementing context-specific solutions requires concerted effort to develop functional, inclusive civic and political institutions [29,30] and to improve scenario-based stakeholder planning [31].…”

Regional model of simultaneous investment, production and financial planning of programmes for innovative development

“…Dobrzanski and Bobowski determined that increased spending on innovation leads to disproportionate effects in regional public management [13]. Dehmer et al predict, based on the evolving pattern of past R&D costs for forward-looking projections and considering the absence of any noticeable changes in science policy and spending priorities, a continuing major shift in R&D geography towards Asia, as well as a large and growing (in many contexts) gap between the scientific haves and have-nots in the world [14]. Kiselakova et al reiterated the importance of placing emphasis on increase in R&D costs, especially in the higher education sector, as this has a significant impact on improving the global competitiveness of Central and Eastern European member states of the European Union [15].…”

Natural laboratories in emerging countries and comparative advantages in science: Evidence from Chile

“…For example, while the 12 largest Latin American countries barely contributed 2.4% of the world's research and development (R&D) expenditures in 2017, the United States, China, Japan, South Korea, and 24 countries from Europe accounted for almost 80% (Anonymous, 2018a). In addition, while two‐thirds of the R&D effort in the developed world comes from the private sector, public institutions perform most R&D in ECs (Dehmer et al, 2019). Given this situation, nations from the developing world find it extremely hard to compete in scientific research with developed countries as demonstrated by any metric, for example, number of published research articles and related citations, degree of scientific diversification, number of patents, scientific awards, etc.…”