Reshaping how we think about evaluation: A made in Africa evaluation perspective

Abstract

Background: The African development space is dominated by the Western hegemony that shapes the structural funding model, knowledge transfer and aid. Western hegemony defines the Western countries or development funders as superior to the aid receivers, without necessarily acknowledging the role of colonial history and racism that defined and influenced the underdevelopment of African countries. In the African context, the Global North uses liberalism as a tool to maintain hegemony; hence, there is no need to use colonial coercion as liberalism is self-reinforcing, self-legitimising and self-perpetuating. It absorbs counter-hegemony via its international institutions, economic interdependence and democracy.Objectives: This article examines how evaluation as a tool has perpetuated Western hegemony on the epistemological, axiological and ontological understanding of development in sub-Saharan Africa.Methods: The approach adopted in this article involved a traditional review of literature, analysis of tacit knowledge and personal experiences on evaluation practice in Africa.Results: Firstly, the article demonstrates that the theories and practice behind international development are based on colonial thinking and subjugation that permeate themselves throughout the conceptualisation, design and implementation and how results of development interventions are evaluated and viewed. Secondly, the article provides practical steps on how to decolonise international development and evaluations in Africa. The findings also show that evaluations should not be treated separately from the dominant forces that define international development. The evaluation field is a microcosm and an appendage of Western hegemonic influence on international development.Conclusion: The article concludes by advocating for the need to change the approach to international development and evaluation practice and emphasising the centrality of the worldviews and values of targeted populations by development interventions.

Made in Africa Evaluation

“…The framework, according to the author, provides an opportunity to develop a collective ontology and epistemology of knowledge production in African evaluation. Masvaure and Motlanthe (2022) also highlight the point that the African development space is dominated by a Western hegemony that shapes the structural funding model, knowledge transfer and aid. The Western hegemony defines the Western countries or development funders as superior to the aid receivers, without necessarily acknowledging the role of colonial history and racism that defined and influenced the underdevelopment of African countries.…”

The inclusive, manumit, practice-based, accessible, community-focused and timely framework

“…Little attention is given to African indigenous literary and philosophical traditions because they are viewed as primitive and unscientific (Kaya 2013). These ideologies are, however, baked in colonial thinking that still impact evaluation in Africa (Masvaure & Motlanthe 2022). Chilisa and Malunga (2012) both assert that for Made in Africa evaluation to be rooted in decolonisation and indigenisation, which is grounded in the) Ubuntu (community and the essence of being human), five critical elements need to be embraced:…”

Indigenous evaluation: An outsider’s perspective

“…The evaluation field is a microcosm and an appendage of Western hegemonic influence on international development (Masvaure & Motlanthe, 2022). Advocates of/believers in Made in Africa (MAE) still have their work ahead of them in clarifying what MAE means, and involves how it can contest, not accommodate, the narcissism of Western "icons" and ignore the pronouncements of-far too manyevaluators addicted to single narratives and rigid methodological dogmas (Picciotto, 2020).…”