2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.03.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reshaping endoplasmic reticulum quality control through the unfolded protein response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
116
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
0
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine whether GANAB was involved in the regulation of ERS signaling, we conducted experiments to quantitate the transcriptional activation of ATF6 by using siRNA-mediated GANAB knockdown in bladder cancer cell lines with/without tunicamycin (Tm) stimulation. According to previous studies, ATF6 activation is one of the critical signals of ERS [ 14 ] and G3BP1 is a marker of SG formation [ 15 ]. Interestingly, we found that Tm treatment induced the up-regulation of GANAB expression (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine whether GANAB was involved in the regulation of ERS signaling, we conducted experiments to quantitate the transcriptional activation of ATF6 by using siRNA-mediated GANAB knockdown in bladder cancer cell lines with/without tunicamycin (Tm) stimulation. According to previous studies, ATF6 activation is one of the critical signals of ERS [ 14 ] and G3BP1 is a marker of SG formation [ 15 ]. Interestingly, we found that Tm treatment induced the up-regulation of GANAB expression (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coordinate downregulation of at least ten ER chaperone genes, including Hspa5 and Hsp90b1, in PWS β-cells, but not the whole suite of UPR genes, supports the hypothesis that a PWS-imprinted gene or genes governs a pathway that coordinately regulates ER chaperones in a unique gene regulatory network (GRN). Although many of the DEGs that encode ER chaperones in PWS INS-1 β-cells are known ATF6 and/or XBP1 targets, numerous ATF6, IRE1α/XBP1, and ATF4/CHOP (PERK pathway) target genes [80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89] are not dysregulated in PWS INS-1 lines, suggesting a novel GRN in PWS β-cells. Candidate transcription factors (TFs) within the PWS-ER chaperone GRN are those with binding site motifs enriched in the promoters of DEGs in PWS β-cells, including, but not limited to the known ATF6 co-factor NFYA, which has roles in insulin secretion and glucose homeostasis [90], as well as PPARB/D also with known roles in βcell mass and insulin secretion [91].…”
Section: A Putative Pws-er Chaperone Gene Regulatory Network (Grn)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Providing sufficient space to prevent protein overcrowding has been shown to alleviate the stress ( Schuck et al., 2009 ). Along with promoting chaperone and lipid biogenesis, the UPR also signals for the production of some autophagy-related genes, thereby inducing ER-phagy ( Bernales et al., 2007 ) (for more details on UPR, please refer to Wiseman et al, [2022] in this issue of Molecular Cell ). ER-phagy is hypothesized to fulfill different functions in the course of ER stress—initially, it might facilitate degradation of luminal protein aggregates, and later, it might aid the ER in shrinking back to its original size by degrading excess membranes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%