Reservoirs and transmission routes of leprosy; A systematic review

Abstract

Leprosy is a chronic infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae (M. leprae) and the more recently discovered Mycobacterium lepromatosis (M. lepromatosis). The two leprosy bacilli cause similar pathologic conditions. They primarily target the skin and the peripheral nervous system. Currently it is considered a Neglected Tropical Disease, being endemic in specific locations within countries of the Americas, Asia, and Africa, while in Europe it is only rarely reported. The reason for a spatial inequality in the prevalence of leprosy in so-called endemic pockets within a country is still largely unexplained. A systematic review was conducted targeting leprosy transmission research data, using PubMed and Scopus as sources. Publications between January 1, 1945 and July 1, 2019 were included. The transmission pathways of M. leprae are not fully understood. Solid evidence exists of an increased risk for individuals living in close contact with leprosy patients, most likely through infectious aerosols, created by coughing and sneezing, but possibly also through direct contact. However, this systematic review underscores that human-to-human transmission is not the only way leprosy can be acquired. The transmission of this disease is probably much more complicated than was thought before. In the Americas, the nine-banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus) has been established as another natural host and reservoir of M. leprae. Anthroponotic and zoonotic transmission have both been proposed as modes of contracting the disease, based on data showing identical M. leprae strains shared between humans and armadillos. More recently, in red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris) with leprosy-like lesions in the British Isles M. leprae and M. lepromatosis DNA was detected. This finding was unexpected, because leprosy is considered a disease of humans (with the exception of the armadillo), and because it was thought that leprosy (and M. leprae) had disappeared from the United Kingdom. Furthermore, animals can be affected by other leprosy-like diseases, caused by pathogens phylogenetically closely related to M. leprae. These mycobacteria have been proposed to be grouped as a M. leprae-complex. We argue that insights from the transmission and reservoirs of members of the M. leprae-complex might be relevant for leprosy research. A better understanding of possible animal or environmental reservoirs is needed, because transmission from such reservoirs may partly explain the steady PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES

How Colonial Power, Colonized People, and Nature Shaped Hansen’s Disease Settlements in Suriname

“…In the narratives of patients, sand (soil) and animals are considered "carriers" of the disease. Meanwhile, modern scientific research has shown that leprosy bacteria can actually survive in the soil and furthermore occur in certain animals in nature [76]. It should come as no surprise that the limited information on this matter from neighboring countries also points in the same direction.…”

Actualización en lepra. epidemiología, fisopatología, clasificación, diagnostico y tratatamiento

“…El Mycobacterium leprae al entrar al organismo es fagocitado y destruido por los polimorfonucleares. En la enfermedad de Hansen el bacilo logra evadir esta barrera defensiva, por lo que es fagocitado por macrófago, el complejo bacilo-macrófago se aloja en la piel, en las mucosas y alrededor de vasos sanguíneos y los nervios (16). En 2020 han surgido nuevos hallazgos en cuanto a la fisiopatología de la enfermedad de Hansen, Cristina et al Indica que existe interferencia entre el metabolismo celular y las respuestas inflamatorias / inmunes y explica cómo estas pueden influir entre sí.…”

Patients with skin smear positive leprosy in Bangladesh are the main risk factor for leprosy development: 21-year follow-up in the household contact study (COCOA)

“…Environmental and zoonotic reservoirs have been described as modes of transmission of infection, however their significance in terms of case numbers is not fully understood. [ 19 ]…”