Proceedings of SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition 2001
DOI: 10.2523/71324-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reservoir Modeling Using Multiple-Point Statistics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, often the marginal distributions of the different categories in the TI are not equal to those of the real sample, which needs to be simulated; that is, the percentages of occurrence of the different categories diverge between the TI and the desired simulation. Strebelle and Journel [32] implemented a method to adapt this discrepancy of the marginal category distribution. However, if the marginal probability of the TI and the desired marginal probability are not close enough to each other, the algorithm would not reproduce the desired proportions of each category present in the simulated images.…”
Section: Snesim Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, often the marginal distributions of the different categories in the TI are not equal to those of the real sample, which needs to be simulated; that is, the percentages of occurrence of the different categories diverge between the TI and the desired simulation. Strebelle and Journel [32] implemented a method to adapt this discrepancy of the marginal category distribution. However, if the marginal probability of the TI and the desired marginal probability are not close enough to each other, the algorithm would not reproduce the desired proportions of each category present in the simulated images.…”
Section: Snesim Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four general scale orders can be recognized, which are pore to lithofacies, lithofacies to geomodel, and geomodel to reservoir model. Multiplepoint geostatistics (MPS) gained importance in the recent years for modelling geological structures at different spatial scales, from m to m [32,33]. For example, in the field of hydrology, MPS allows building models on decameter scale [34], while Okabe and Blunt [35] used the technique to model pore space on a micrometer scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For one of the representative stationary reservoirs, most stochastic modelling methods (including MPS) were tested in the fluvial reservoir and showed widely approved results [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. However, in the delta reservoir, the sedimentary characteristics change along the source direction, and the model is not accepted for a fluvial deposit with the use of MPS based on the stationary hypothesis [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the Sequential Indicator Simulation (SIS) (Caers, 2005), lacks the ability to control facies boundary conditions, the Truncated Gaussian Simulation (TGS) (Caers, 2005), provides for only simple facies transitional boundaries and while Object (also termed Boolean) Simulation (OS) can manage most non-overprinted complex facies sets, it is unstable in the presence of high density, closely spaced wells, highly computationally intensive and reliant on the (3D) training image models (Caers, 2005). Multi-Point GeoStatistics (MPS) (Strebelle and Journel, 2001) is rapidly growing in popularity offering the modeler the ability to create geological models with complex geometries, while conditioning to large amounts of well and seismic data. However, as pointed out by Daly and Mariethoz (2011), it is still a relatively new topic, which has had a long academic history and is now just finding its way into commercial software.…”
Section: Geologically-driven Facies Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%