SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition 2001
DOI: 10.2118/71324-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reservoir Modeling Using Multiple-Point Statistics

Abstract: Two approaches are traditionally used to build numerical models for facies distributions within a reservoir. Pixel-based techniques aim at generating simulated realizations that honor the well data values, and reproduce a given variogram which models two-point spatial correlation. However, because the variogram cannot look at spatial continuity between more than two locations at a time, pixel-based algorithms give poor representations of the actual facies geometries. In contrast, object-based techniques allow … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their inference requires a training image depicting the expected patterns of geological heterogeneities. Training images can be obtained from observations of outcrops, geological reconstructions and geophysical data (Strebelle and Journel, 2001). In this study, training images are constructed based on observations of outcrops.…”
Section: Training Image Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their inference requires a training image depicting the expected patterns of geological heterogeneities. Training images can be obtained from observations of outcrops, geological reconstructions and geophysical data (Strebelle and Journel, 2001). In this study, training images are constructed based on observations of outcrops.…”
Section: Training Image Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple-point geostatistics (Strebelle 2000;Strebelle 2002;Strebelle et al 2002;Caers and Zhang 2003;Feyen and Caers , 2006) aims to overcome the limitations of the variogram. The premise of multiple-point geostatistics is to move beyond two-point correlations between variables and to obtain (cross) correlation moments at multiple locations at a time (Strebelle and Journel, 2001). Because of the limited direct information from the subsurface, such statistical information cannot directly be obtained from samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A numerical representation of a synthetic reservoir, composed of channelized sand deposits is used as a benchmark to assess the relative performance of two geostatistical simulation algorithms in predicting compartmentalization under various well densities (dynamic data which could define reservoir compartments is not considered in this example). The two algorithms examined here are: Sequential Indicator Simulation (Journel & Isaaks 1984) and Multiple-Point Statistics simulation (Strebelle & Journel 2001). Since the synthetic reservoir that is being inverted is perfectly known, no uncertainty is implied in the input parameters of the simulation algorithms.…”
Section: Connectivity Uncertainty In Reservoir Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonstationary issue is addressed by using probability cubes describing local probabilities of net-to-gross ratio, at any location in the reservoir, as soft conditioning to a Multiple-Point Statistics algorithm. The third issue, regarding specific stratigraphic sequences can be addressed using advanced modelling algorithms, such as Multiple-Point statistics simulation (Strebelle & Journel 2001), object modelling or an Event Based approach (Pyrcz & Strebelle 2008). Figure 9a represents three stochastic reservoirs in three deepwater environments: a slope valley channel complex, a weakly confined channel complex, and an unconfined channel and sheet complex.…”
Section: Modelling Stochastic Reservoirs In Various Depositional Settmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, they borrow the patterns to be reproduced from training images. A training image is defined as the numerical representation of expected subsurface heterogeneities believed to exist in the area being modeled and does not necessarily carry any locally accurate information (Strebelle 2000;Strebelle and Journel 2001). However, a training image should reflect a spatial continuity style similar to the actual phenomenon (Arpat and Caers 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%