SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium 2015
DOI: 10.2118/173305-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reservoir Management Under Geological Uncertainty Using Fast Model Update

Abstract: Statoil is implementing "Fast Model Update (FMU)," an integrated and automated workflow for reservoir modeling and characterization. FMU connects all steps and disciplines from seismic depth conversion to prediction and reservoir management taking into account relevant reservoir uncertainty. FMU delivers an ensemble of geologically-consistent and history-matched model realizations that together characterizes the reservoir uncertainty. FMU facilitates management of the reservoir (e.g. field development plan, we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a reservoir history-matching problem, the model operator is typically the reservoir simulation model, which, given the input forcing and a parameterization, which defines the model, simulates the produced fluid rates. Some recent applications use a full Fast-Model-Update workflow [7,8] where the model workflow can also contain, e.g., a geological forward model, a reservoir simulation model, and a seismic forward model, which, given the inputs to the geological description, predicts the production of oil, water, gas, and the seismic response from the reservoir. Given a set of input parameters, x, the prediction of y is precisely determined by the model in Equation (1).…”
Section: History-matching Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a reservoir history-matching problem, the model operator is typically the reservoir simulation model, which, given the input forcing and a parameterization, which defines the model, simulates the produced fluid rates. Some recent applications use a full Fast-Model-Update workflow [7,8] where the model workflow can also contain, e.g., a geological forward model, a reservoir simulation model, and a seismic forward model, which, given the inputs to the geological description, predicts the production of oil, water, gas, and the seismic response from the reservoir. Given a set of input parameters, x, the prediction of y is precisely determined by the model in Equation (1).…”
Section: History-matching Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predictive value of a properly history-matched model is never guaranteed (and, in fact, usually rather limited), but it is generally accepted that a geologically realistic model will have a higher chance of properly predicting the future reservoir behavior than an unrealistic one. A major trend in reservoir data assimilation is therefore to perform the data assimilation directly on the fine scale geological model, a technique sometimes referred to as 'big loop' history matching, and to extend the range of unknown parameters to include structural features; see, e.g., Seiler et al (2010) and Hanea et al (2015).…”
Section: Application Case Reservoir Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite much work performed in the area of data uncertainty management (Feraille and Busby 2009, Hanea et al 2015, Rijnders 1974, and Tipping et al 2006), many issues still exist regarding data management during the field development plan. The multivariate approach is based on multiple runs of all possible realizations of the initial data on the simulation model.…”
Section: The Concept Of Multivariate Approach In 3d Reservoir Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%