The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.92.033616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reservoir interactions during Bose-Einstein condensation: Modified critical scaling in the Kibble-Zurek mechanism of defect formation

Abstract: As a test of the Kibble-Zurek mechanism (KZM) of defect formation, we simulate the Bose-Einstein condensation transition in a toroidally confined Bose gas using the stochastic projected Gross-Pitaevskii equation (SPGPE), with and without the energy-damping reservoir interaction. Energy-damping alters the scaling of the winding number distribution with the quench time -a departure from the universal KZM theory that relies on equilibrium critical exponents. Numerical values are obtained for the correlation-lengt… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(111 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe our predictions suggest an interesting regime for experimental testing. The need for rigorous testing [76] of dissipative quantum field theories describing open systems is further motivated by interest in superfluid internal convection [77,78], farfrom equilibrium dynamics [25,79], thermalisation [80,81], and critical phenomena [48,[82][83][84][85].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe our predictions suggest an interesting regime for experimental testing. The need for rigorous testing [76] of dissipative quantum field theories describing open systems is further motivated by interest in superfluid internal convection [77,78], farfrom equilibrium dynamics [25,79], thermalisation [80,81], and critical phenomena [48,[82][83][84][85].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[60][61][62] and Refs. [41,[63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78], respectfully. Notably, the SPGPE has been able to quantitatively describe experimental results, such as in Refs.…”
Section: Classical Field Methodologymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[59][60][61] and Refs. [41,[62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77], respectfully. Notably, the SPGPE has been able to quantitatively, describe experimental results, such as in Refs.…”
Section: Classical Field Methodologymentioning
confidence: 96%