2020
DOI: 10.1016/s1876-3804(20)60071-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reservoir geological modeling and significance of Cambrian Xiaoerblak Formation in Keping outcrop area, Tarim Basin, NW China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Structurally, the study area is a part of the eastern segment of Kalpin fault-uplift zone in the North Tarim Uplift [26,27], and has a complete Ediacaran outcrop (Figure 1c). The Sugetbrak Formation is in conformable contact with the Chigbrak Formation (Figure 2a), the Lower Cambrian Yurtus Formation has a parallel unconformable contact with the Chigbrak Formation (Figure 2b) and the Scholbrak Formation is in conformable contact with the Yurtus and Usugar Formations [28]. In Aksu outcrop area, the Chigbrak Formation is about 173.5 m thick, and divided into four members from bottom to top according to color, lithology and sedimentary structure (Figure 3).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structurally, the study area is a part of the eastern segment of Kalpin fault-uplift zone in the North Tarim Uplift [26,27], and has a complete Ediacaran outcrop (Figure 1c). The Sugetbrak Formation is in conformable contact with the Chigbrak Formation (Figure 2a), the Lower Cambrian Yurtus Formation has a parallel unconformable contact with the Chigbrak Formation (Figure 2b) and the Scholbrak Formation is in conformable contact with the Yurtus and Usugar Formations [28]. In Aksu outcrop area, the Chigbrak Formation is about 173.5 m thick, and divided into four members from bottom to top according to color, lithology and sedimentary structure (Figure 3).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current methods for analyzing water content include water content gray GM (1,1) model, logistic cycle model, generalized usher model, and five models that characterize the relationship between water content and recovery degree (concave type, concave-S transition type, S type, S-convex transition type, and convex type). The main controlling factors affecting the rise of water cut are reservoir heterogeneity and the difference in water absorption status of water wells [28]. The main factors affecting the change law of water cut in low permeability oilfields are fluid properties (oil-water viscosity ratio) and reservoir physical properties (permeability, starting pressure).…”
Section: ) Evaluation Of Water Injection Development Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Economic interest has driven increased research into the sedimentary facies of the Early Cambrian Xiaoerbulake Formation in the Tarim Basin. Researchers have proposed that the Xiaoerbulake Formation belongs to the sedimentary facies zone of ramp, ramptidal flat, restricted platform, semi-evaporative platform, open platform margin or slopebasin [14,[18][19][20][21]. However, previous studies mainly focused on limited well logging and cutting data and low-resolution 2D and 3D seismic data, but did not thoroughly address with the facies and facies associations of the Early Cambrian Xiaoerbulake Formation carbonate ramp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%