Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
As the oil and gas industry is continuously pushing boundaries of exploiting resources, it becomes more of a mandate to model and optimize forefront technologies. Multilateral wells are one example of a prevalent technology to maximize reservoir contact and return on investment. Optimum design and placement of this type of wells is significant. This work presents a multi-parametric optimization approach that optimizes the design of multilateral wells and maximizes the contact with highly productive hydrocarbon zones in the reservoir. Given a number of input parameters, the design and placement of multilateral wells is modeled using the Graph Theory principles and is optimized using Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) algorithms. The objective function is defined in this work as maximization function of the Total Contact with Sweetspots (TCS). At first, multiple main wellbores are optimized globally across the field and then several local optimizations are performed around each main wellbore to place the laterals. This optimization is subject to a number of input constraints, such as the maximum number of laterals, minimum spacing between wells, and maximum lateral length. Different sets of uncertainty parameters are generated using Latin-Hypercube Sampling (LHS) technique and used as input constraints in multiple well design realizations. In this work, the SPE10 benchmark model with 4 million grid cells and 10 existing producer wells was used. MIP was used in this work to optimize the initial geometry and placement of 20 new multilateral producers while LHS was used to fine-tune well configurations. Using TCS as the objective function in this multi-parametric optimization approach dramatically reduced the number of numerical simulation runs. The multi-parametric optimization generates multiple realizations with different sets of multilateral wells with different configurations. Numerical results from the benchmark model revealed the optimum solution with maximized hydrocarbon production. This resulted in a more practical approach to simultaneously optimize the placement of multilateral wells in large simulation models. In addition, the results reveal that the design, placement and performance of the new wells are highly sensitive to the sweetspot maps and reservoir heterogeneity. Using TCS as the objective function resulted in avoiding the excessive use of numerical simulation and cutting down the turnaround time for optimizing the design and placement of multilateral wells. In addition, the global and local optimizations used in this approach significantly simplified the mathematical formulation and avoided complex network modeling and optimization for multilateral wells.
As the oil and gas industry is continuously pushing boundaries of exploiting resources, it becomes more of a mandate to model and optimize forefront technologies. Multilateral wells are one example of a prevalent technology to maximize reservoir contact and return on investment. Optimum design and placement of this type of wells is significant. This work presents a multi-parametric optimization approach that optimizes the design of multilateral wells and maximizes the contact with highly productive hydrocarbon zones in the reservoir. Given a number of input parameters, the design and placement of multilateral wells is modeled using the Graph Theory principles and is optimized using Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) algorithms. The objective function is defined in this work as maximization function of the Total Contact with Sweetspots (TCS). At first, multiple main wellbores are optimized globally across the field and then several local optimizations are performed around each main wellbore to place the laterals. This optimization is subject to a number of input constraints, such as the maximum number of laterals, minimum spacing between wells, and maximum lateral length. Different sets of uncertainty parameters are generated using Latin-Hypercube Sampling (LHS) technique and used as input constraints in multiple well design realizations. In this work, the SPE10 benchmark model with 4 million grid cells and 10 existing producer wells was used. MIP was used in this work to optimize the initial geometry and placement of 20 new multilateral producers while LHS was used to fine-tune well configurations. Using TCS as the objective function in this multi-parametric optimization approach dramatically reduced the number of numerical simulation runs. The multi-parametric optimization generates multiple realizations with different sets of multilateral wells with different configurations. Numerical results from the benchmark model revealed the optimum solution with maximized hydrocarbon production. This resulted in a more practical approach to simultaneously optimize the placement of multilateral wells in large simulation models. In addition, the results reveal that the design, placement and performance of the new wells are highly sensitive to the sweetspot maps and reservoir heterogeneity. Using TCS as the objective function resulted in avoiding the excessive use of numerical simulation and cutting down the turnaround time for optimizing the design and placement of multilateral wells. In addition, the global and local optimizations used in this approach significantly simplified the mathematical formulation and avoided complex network modeling and optimization for multilateral wells.
Sweetspot identification methods are of significant value in optimizing well placement in reservoir simulation studies. These methods vary in their approaches due to the wide-ranging reservoir characteristics and different study objectives. This work analyzes a number of sweetspot identification methods and discusses their advantages and limitations. In addition, we establish a workflow that utilizes a combination of a number of reliable methods. A simulation model of a synthetic heterogeneous reservoir with six million grid-cells is used in this work to evaluate six sweetspot identification methods for the purpose of well placement. The evaluated methods use grid-cell productivity, fluxes and sweep ratio as well as a combination of a number of rock and fluid properties to generate sweetspot 3D maps. Using sweetspot maps from the analyzed methods and the proposed workflow, different well placement scenarios are developed and compared. Results are compared using total hydrocarbon production and voidage replacement ratio. We observe that wells placed using grid-cell productivity maps achieve significant improvement in the total hydrocarbon production over a period of ten years when compared to the other analyzed methods. This method identifies the high productive grid-cells which results in the best performance of wells among the analyzed methods. However, this method provided less emphasis on the grid-cells proximity and connectivity in the sweetspot map. In heterogeneous reservoirs, this can result in tortuous trajectory paths, which are impractical to drill. The flux-based method yielded less hydrocarbon production, but higher voidage replacement ratio. The proposed workflow demonstrated considerable improvements in the total oil production and a balance in voidage replacement ratio. The new workflow retained the advantages of different methods maintaining a balance between their strengths and marking distinct methodology that can be used for well placement optimization. This work highlights potential opportunities to improve the sweep efficiency in heterogeneous reservoirs by developing a hybrid workflow that integrates existing tools and methodologies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.