SPE Energy Resources Conference 2014
DOI: 10.2118/169989-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reserves Evaluation of Dry Gas Reservoirs through Flowing Pressure Material Balance Method

Abstract: This paper describes the practical applicacion of a method known as Flowing Gas Material Balance FGMB (L. Mattar and Mcneil, 1997) for reserve's estimation using bottomhole flowing pressure data in two dry gas fields in Mexico. The main purpose of this work is to apply the method in real cases having enough data and make a comparison with other standard methods of reserves estimation (J. Lee, 1996 and G.J. DeSorcy, 1994) such as Volumetric, Decline Curve Analysis, Conventional Material Balance and Numerical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dynamic methods (King 1990(King , 1993Clarkson et al 2007;Ahmed et al 2006;Salmachi and Karacan 2017) are usually used to evaluate and prove the previous calculated OGIP of a CBM reservoir by using production data during its development. Because the control area of the coal formation is not easy to determine, the OGIP evaluated by the volumetric method is a low probability value and often considered as a reference, while the dynamic methods which use the production performances of CBM wells are more credible (Guzman et al 2014). However, most dynamic methods, such as the material balance equation (MBE) method, are limited in use because it is impossible to shut in all CBM wells to measure the average pressure (Morad and Clarkson 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic methods (King 1990(King , 1993Clarkson et al 2007;Ahmed et al 2006;Salmachi and Karacan 2017) are usually used to evaluate and prove the previous calculated OGIP of a CBM reservoir by using production data during its development. Because the control area of the coal formation is not easy to determine, the OGIP evaluated by the volumetric method is a low probability value and often considered as a reference, while the dynamic methods which use the production performances of CBM wells are more credible (Guzman et al 2014). However, most dynamic methods, such as the material balance equation (MBE) method, are limited in use because it is impossible to shut in all CBM wells to measure the average pressure (Morad and Clarkson 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This methodology does not perform well for most deep CBM wells and is even less reliable for such CBM wells at low gas/liquid ratios. Cullender et al (Cullender and Smith 1956;Peffer et al 1988;Guzman et al 2014) proposed Cullender and Smith methodology for the single-phase well with gas occupying the wellbore. This methodology took the variations in temperature and gas compressibility with depth into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When such gas wells produce at low gas/liquid ratios, this method is even less reliable. Cullender and Smith (see [7,8])…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%