1992
DOI: 10.1016/0378-4266(92)90009-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reserve requirements, bank share prices, and the uniqueeness of bank loans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
15
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to our VR test results, which find that the impact of monetary policy on stock prices is limited in the A-market over this sub-period, we interpret our results to indicate that increases in RRR lead to reductions in banking and finance stock prices. This conclusion is consistent with the tax burden effect of reserve requirements described in previous studies (Kolari et al, 1988;Osborne and Zaher, 1992). The negative patterns in differences between coefficients for A-and H-shares are weaker during the third sub-period.…”
Section: Empirical Findingssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…According to our VR test results, which find that the impact of monetary policy on stock prices is limited in the A-market over this sub-period, we interpret our results to indicate that increases in RRR lead to reductions in banking and finance stock prices. This conclusion is consistent with the tax burden effect of reserve requirements described in previous studies (Kolari et al, 1988;Osborne and Zaher, 1992). The negative patterns in differences between coefficients for A-and H-shares are weaker during the third sub-period.…”
Section: Empirical Findingssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The general evidence for the two-day period of December 4 and 5 suggests a delayed response of large bank stock prices to the news of the reserve requirement change. Although this evidence is unexpected, it is similar to evidence found by Osborne and Zaher (1992) for earlier reserve requirement changes, as they also uncover evidence of a one-day delayed response to many earlier announcements. Large stock prices appear to react as much on the day following the announcement as on the day of the announcement itself.…”
Section: The 1990 Reserve Requirement Change and Bank Share Price Reasupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This empirical evidence appears more consistent with the Cosimano-McDonald monopolistic competition framework than the Fama perfect competition framework. Kolari, Mahajan, and Saunders (1988), Slovin, Sushka, and Bendeck (1990), and Osborne and Zaher (1992) find evidence of abnormal stock returns around the time of unexpected, permanent reserve requirement changes. These studies consider reserve requirement changes in the United States before the 1990 change.…”
Section: Commercial Bank Stock Returns and Reserve Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, as pointed out by Rajan (1992), the bank has an incentive to "behave" with its old customers to get in on subsequent projects. Evidence provided by James (1992) on investment banks is consistent with this view: the underwriter spread was significantly lower in the initial public offerings in which the issuing firm made a subsequent equity offer, and the customer was the more likely to switch the poorer the investment banker's prior pricing performance (see also Boyd and Prescott (1986), Diamond (1984Diamond ( , 1991, Diamond and Rajan (2001), Fama (1985), Flannery (1983), Lummer and McConnell (1989), and Osborne and Zaher (1992)). …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%