“…The ER model remains of critical international policy importance because it contributes to the ongoing theoretical debate on people and parks as a means of effective conservation (See key texts by Kramer et al, 1997;Brandon, 1998;Oates, 1999;Terborgh, 1999;Schwartzman et al, 2000;Moegenburg & Levey, 2002;Peres, 2005;Redford & Painter, 2006;West & Brockington, 2006;Schmidt-Soltau & Brockington, 2007;Vadjunec & Rocheleau, 2009).With much of the "people and parks" literature citing people as predators, the ER model faced strong opposition, especially during its nascent stages of development. The most strident critiques of ERs were produced by Browder (1990; and Homma (1989;1993), and continue to be cited as ground for criticism (more recently, see also Freitas et al, 2017;Homma, 2018), despite the lack of updated information. Despite early criticism by some, ERs also had strong early proponents as well.…”