1982
DOI: 10.1017/s002221510009280x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resection of the tongue with the carbon dioxide laser

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the disadvantage of using either of these modes is longer operative time. 1,3 This was evident in our study, as resection using EC took 43% less time than resection using FECL. When using the instrument in larger subjects (humans), the difference in procedure time may become a greater concern.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…However, the disadvantage of using either of these modes is longer operative time. 1,3 This was evident in our study, as resection using EC took 43% less time than resection using FECL. When using the instrument in larger subjects (humans), the difference in procedure time may become a greater concern.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…[15I) It is an atraumatic procedure that avoids bleeding and facilitates a comfortable and relatively pain-free postoperative recovery. [152) …”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They achieve results comparable to those of conventional surgery while providing minimal invasiveness [2][3][4][5][6], a great healing potential and less postoperative inflammation and swelling [7][8][9][10][11]. The concomitant coagulation of small blood vessels allows for a dry operating field and better visibility [12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%