2000
DOI: 10.3171/jns.2000.92.6.1028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resection of suprasellar tumors by using a modified transsphenoidal approach

Abstract: Generally accepted contraindications to using a transsphenoidal approach for resection of tumors that arise in or extend into the suprasellar region include a normal-sized sella turcica, normal pituitary function, and adherence of tumor to vital intracranial structures. Thus, the transsphenoidal approach has traditionally been restricted to the removal of tumors involving the pituitary fossa and, occasionally, to suprasellar extensions of such tumors if the sella is enlarged. However, conventional transcranial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
98
1
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
98
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The addition and sole use of the endoscope in the expanded, microscopic approaches described by others 17,20,25 allows improved visualization, which, in turn, allows the further expansion of the previously described approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The addition and sole use of the endoscope in the expanded, microscopic approaches described by others 17,20,25 allows improved visualization, which, in turn, allows the further expansion of the previously described approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,24,30 Although the transsphenoidal approach is traditionally limited to predominantly sellar lesions with secondary suprasellar extension, 23 the development and application of the "extended approach" have provided greater access to suprasellar lesions. 17,20,25 Despite this modification, outcomes from the transsphenoidal approach for the resection of suprasellar tumors with adherence to critical surrounding structures have led to more frequent recurrences and poorer overall outcomes compared with purely sellar tumors. 17 Some of the limitations of this approach, as previously described, may be secondary to the use of the microscope, 2 distance from the surgical target, the small portal of entry to the surgical field (that is, the nostril), and the need for a speculum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A second staged transsphenoidal approach can be contemplated if there is descent of the remaining tumor in the sella [18,19]. Modified and extended endoscopic transsphenoidal approach can be also used [20][21][22]. One should never also forget other lines of treatment that can still be used successfully and involves medical and radiotherapeutic approaches [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most tumors are soft and suckable. However, invasive, vascular and fibrous tumors can limit the surgical removal especially with enlarged size [20,21]. Prognosis should always be correlated to well-defined criteria of invasion such as MRI, growth rate and clinical follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%