Researching violent contexts: A call for political reflexivity

Abstract

Violent contexts are not “normal” research settings; they involve abuses, power disparities, and collective histories of violence that researchers should be alert to. Being unreflexive to these risks can cause harm in the form of objectifying people and context, normalizing violence, or silencing voices. Political reflexivity can equip researchers to better identify, understand and mitigate these harms, and where possible, challenge structures that do the marginalizing. We articulate political reflexivity through feminist standpoint theory, which asks researchers to critically examine their positionality and privilege in relation to the geopolitics of the research setting, epistemic privilege of marginalized participants, and political implications of their work. Practicing political reflexivity can help researchers situate their work along a “decoloniality continuum,” which includes research complicit with the maintenance of violence, a hybridity approach that aims to understand and challenge the (colonial) underpinnings of violence by centering marginalized knowledge, and research that seeks reparation or liberation, meaning redress and radical equality for marginalized peoples, ideas and histories. We conclude with a call for researchers to identify methods and paths to strengthen our understanding of political reflexivity, and to support efforts to decolonize knowledge.

Education, decolonisation and international development at the Institute of Education (London): a historical analysis

“…Third, there are studies which see the decolonial as a more profound shift in naming Whiteness, identifying the consequences of a particular epistemic gaze and trying to shift power imbalances through different forms of practice. Laila's work, and that of other CEID colleagues, articulates this (Abdelnour and Abu Moghli, 2020;Kadiwal and Durrani, 2018).…”

Feminism from the margins: How women are contesting the “othering” of Muslims through arts‐based resistance?

“…As a researcher, we realize the need to pay attention to intellectual politics that maintain creative‐critical distance from the researched, focus on descriptive aspects of our academic narratives, and produce argumentative openness (Ahmed, 2020). This has encouraged us to take a politically reflexive position that not only goes beyond the problem of speaking from either a Hindu or a Muslim position but commit ourselves to challenge the structures that do the marginalizing (Abdelnour & Moghli, 2021).…”

We Are Boiling: Management Scholars Speaking Out on COVID-19 and Social Justice

“…Framing crises as settings from which to theorize organizational practices and not as outcomes of complex nested systems reduces our capacity to understand crises as organizational phenomena involving the production of vulnerability, risk, and response ( Calhoun, 2004 ). The consequences of doing so include the perpetuation of a convenient ignorance concerning power, culpability, our own complicity, and the responsibility to do no harm ( Abdelnour & Abu Moghli, 2021 ).…”