2009
DOI: 10.1177/0170840609104809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Researching Strategy Practices: A Genealogical Social Theory Perspective

Abstract: This paper explores the meaning and significance of the term `social practice' and its relation to strategy-as-practice research from the perspective of social theory. Although our remarks are also applicable to other practice-based discussions in management, we discuss strategy practices as a case in point and thus contribute to the strategy-as-practice literature in three ways. First, instead of simply accepting the existence of a unified `practice theory', we outline a genealogical analysis revealing the hi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
114
0
13

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
114
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Early representations of strategy as practice were criticized as being superficial, extending in only marginal ways mainstream positivist views of strategy (Chia & MacKay, 2007;Carter, Clegg, & Kornberger, 2008). Whittington's (2006) development of the praxis, practice and practitioners framework enriched the ideas, as did the work of others who linked strategy as practice to structuration theory (Jarzabkowski, 2004) or to different strands of practice theory (Rasche & Chia, 2009). This paper instead elaborates on the implications of taking a 'narrative turn,' building on and integrating the previous contributions of Barry and Elmes (1997), Whittington (2006) and others cited above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Early representations of strategy as practice were criticized as being superficial, extending in only marginal ways mainstream positivist views of strategy (Chia & MacKay, 2007;Carter, Clegg, & Kornberger, 2008). Whittington's (2006) development of the praxis, practice and practitioners framework enriched the ideas, as did the work of others who linked strategy as practice to structuration theory (Jarzabkowski, 2004) or to different strands of practice theory (Rasche & Chia, 2009). This paper instead elaborates on the implications of taking a 'narrative turn,' building on and integrating the previous contributions of Barry and Elmes (1997), Whittington (2006) and others cited above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The 'visual turn' within organisation studies (Davison et al, 2012;Meyer, Höllerer, Jancsary, & van Leeuwen, 2013) provides new methodologies required by the accompanying 'practice turn' which seeks to explore organisational processes, including CSR (Rasche, de Bakker & Moon, 2013), as they unfold (Rasche & Chia, 2009). Organisations are sites of visible, everyday practice, e.g.…”
Section: Applying the Visual To Business And Society Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, service nepotism as a practice not only provides the context for activities; it also serves as the context in which arrangements exist for the transformation of the social. Schatzki (2001: 49), in accounting for this, refers to mental phenomena such as desires, hopes, fear and anxiety as fundamental "states of affairs" that enable actors to 'cope' with their involvement with the world (Heidegger, 1977;Rasche and Chia, 2009). Expressed in behaviour, we argue that such phenomena inform and drive service nepotism in multi-ethnic marketplaces by extending understanding and determining the actions of people during service encounters.…”
Section: A Practice Approach To Service Nepotismmentioning
confidence: 93%