2019
DOI: 10.5553/tcc/221195072019009002003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Researching elites at the margins of research ethics frameworks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…My data consists of subjective interpretations about my own experiences as a ‘complete participant’ in the field, employed as a fully qualified probation practitioner over a 6-year period (Hesse-Biber, 2016). As probation is inherently secretive (Mawby and Worrall, 2013; Shah, 2020), this required ‘studying up’ the enigmatic topic of community corrections by recognising the inverted balance of power of the organisation that employed me and my own personal experience as the subject of research (Beizsley, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…My data consists of subjective interpretations about my own experiences as a ‘complete participant’ in the field, employed as a fully qualified probation practitioner over a 6-year period (Hesse-Biber, 2016). As probation is inherently secretive (Mawby and Worrall, 2013; Shah, 2020), this required ‘studying up’ the enigmatic topic of community corrections by recognising the inverted balance of power of the organisation that employed me and my own personal experience as the subject of research (Beizsley, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%