2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2015.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Researching CLIL and TBLT interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, a number of researchers have been discussing the ways in which CLIL and TBLT can be brought together (Ahmadian & García-Mayo, 2018;García-Mayo, 2015;Scott & Beadle, 2014;Basterrechea & García-Mayo, 2013). Nevertheless, Ortega (2015) cautiously points out that there are differences in focus that have to be taken into account. The author argues that each approach conceptualizes "meaning" differently (in TBLT it is related to experiential and goal-oriented learning, while in CLIL it is associated with content and subject matter learning), and usually tends to target different age-groups (TBLT has been mostly implemented with college-level language learners, whereas CLIL is mostly applied to school age children).…”
Section: The Articulation Of Tblt and Clilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a number of researchers have been discussing the ways in which CLIL and TBLT can be brought together (Ahmadian & García-Mayo, 2018;García-Mayo, 2015;Scott & Beadle, 2014;Basterrechea & García-Mayo, 2013). Nevertheless, Ortega (2015) cautiously points out that there are differences in focus that have to be taken into account. The author argues that each approach conceptualizes "meaning" differently (in TBLT it is related to experiential and goal-oriented learning, while in CLIL it is associated with content and subject matter learning), and usually tends to target different age-groups (TBLT has been mostly implemented with college-level language learners, whereas CLIL is mostly applied to school age children).…”
Section: The Articulation Of Tblt and Clilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CLIL and TBLT have intrinsic relationship due to their departure from traditional view of language learning. Ortega (2015) pointed out the shared interests between CLIL and TBLT, both of which are based on the tenet that language and meaning are inseparable. Lyster (2015) not only made clear the connections between these two approaches to learning but also showed the connections between language and content learning in CLIL settings are strengthened while infusing the instructional design with key principles of TBLT.…”
Section: The Relationship Between Clil and Tbltmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the communicative task at hand, students will have to walk the audience through their interpretation of X-rays and photographic images to help them see the salient parts related to treatment choices. To this end, we developed a series of communicative activities that elicit the language seen previously (Ortega, 2015) and give students a chance to practice and consolidate appropriate language forms while the teacher guides and facilitates interaction by monitoring the students as they complete the tasks with their peers. The group work also allows for peer feedback on subject content as students will comment and ask questions about each others' cases and indeed help each other with language difficulties.…”
Section: Peer-to-peer Instruction and Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wozniak and Millot (2016) have also emphasised the need for professional relevance and acquisition of a disciplinary and professional culture in English. We also focus on materials, activities, and tasks to explore how an ESP course can raise awareness of specialised language through noticing tasks (Ortega, 2015) and enable students to express their "already established disciplinary expertise" (Whyte, 2016, p. 14). Hyland (2011) points out that learners acquire features of the language as they need them and therefore this type of specific approach is more motivating.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%