Researching candidate sites for a carbon storage complex in the Central Appalachian Basin, USA

Geospatial Variation in Carbon Accounting of Low-Carbon Hydrogen Production Pathways: Implications for the Inflation Reduction Act

“…The power requirement to pump CO2 through this distance and the power required to inject CO2 based on injection pressure needed are calculated based on equation 5. An estimate of the injection pressure is based on the normal pressure gradient of 0.433 psi/ft and the depth of the candidate formations for CO2 storage for each case 79,80 .…”

“…An estimate of the injection pressure assuming a normal hydrostatic pressure gradient of 0.433 psi/ft and an average depth of formations for CO2 sequestration based on the literature 79,80 can be determined by:…”

Influence of supercritical, liquid, and gaseous CO2 on fracture behavior in sandstone

“…CCS technology has been utilized in Norway, the United States, Japan, Australia, Canada, and other countries. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] China has carried out a nationwide assessment of geological sequestration CO 2 storage capacity. [16][17][18] As a country with large coal resources, China has considerable coal bed methane reserves of approximately 3.06 × 10 12 m 3 which can store approximately 2.2664 × 10 10 t of CO 2 .…”

A quantitative risk assessment approach for developing contingency plans at a geologic carbon storage site

“…[7][8][9] Integrated system modeling approaches link sophisticated models of each process at the site (such as storage reservoir dynamics, leakage pathway behavior, and groundwater aquifer impact from leakage) to provide credible forecasts of system behavior that can be used to make key decisions during the development and operation of a GCS site. [52][53][54][55][56] These modeling approaches have been used to evaluate leakage risks, 19,23,[57][58][59][60][61][62][63] inform and optimize both leakage monitoring networks and the duration of postinjection site care, 23,[64][65][66][67][68] assess the long-term probability of successful CO 2 containment, 69 and determine the AoR for a project. 57,70,71 System-based risk assessment modeling can also aid in the development of contingency plans for a GCS operation by quantitatively predicting the impact of various response actions considered on leakage risks amidst uncertainty, but such modeling has not yet been applied in this context.…”

“…[52][53][54][55][56] These modeling approaches have been used to evaluate leakage risks, 19,23,[57][58][59][60][61][62][63] inform and optimize both leakage monitoring networks and the duration of postinjection site care, 23,[64][65][66][67][68] assess the long-term probability of successful CO 2 containment, 69 and determine the AoR for a project. 57,70,71 System-based risk assessment modeling can also aid in the development of contingency plans for a GCS operation by quantitatively predicting the impact of various response actions considered on leakage risks amidst uncertainty, but such modeling has not yet been applied in this context.…”